hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 38 0 Browse Search
Sherman 26 4 Browse Search
Ulric Dahlgren 19 1 Browse Search
Custar 15 3 Browse Search
Chew 10 4 Browse Search
Johnston 9 1 Browse Search
Point Lookout, Md. (Maryland, United States) 8 0 Browse Search
Dalton, Ga. (Georgia, United States) 8 0 Browse Search
John Thomas 8 0 Browse Search
Judson Kilpatrick 7 1 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: March 8, 1864., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 64 total hits in 22 results.

1 2 3
Messrs Laird (search for this): article 7
e legality of the seizure. On that day an information was filed which might have been filed in October or November, and in that way the question might have been brought to an early issue.--Since that information was filed he was informed that Messrs Laird had received an intimation that it was now necessary to send out a commission abroad four months after the seizure for the purpose of collecting evidence. He thought the production of the correspondence between England and the United States on the subject of those seizures could have no sort of bearing upon the case about to be brought before the courts, that case being simply whether Messrs. Laird had or had not in constructing these vessels infringed the municipal laws of England. He reminded Lord Russell that the papers he objected to produce had already been made public in America, and laid before Congress. What he wanted to see now was the English as well as the American version. Earl Derby read copious extracts from the co
Seymour Fitzgerald (search for this): article 7
With regard to the second question of the noble Earl, it be would give the names of the cases to which he referred, there was no objection to produce any correspondence that might have taken place upon them. The subject then dropped Mr. Seymour Fitzgerald called attention to the circumstances attending the capture of certain British vessels — the Springbok, the barque science, captured at Metamores ship Margaret and Jessie, and Saxon, captured within the jurisdiction of the Colony of the Cs obviously a truckling one so strong Powers and a harsh and exciting one to want powers. After a general details, in which the truckling policy of Earl Russell was strongly discussed by several speakers Lord Palmerston appeared to Mr. Fitzgerald to withdraw his motion, and said it was due to the Government of-the United States to sag that they had invariably received our applications in a spirit of equity and justice. It was also necessary to refer to the case of the Trent to-show t
England (search for this): article 7
judicial decision as to the legality of the seizure. On that day an information was filed which might have been filed in October or November, and in that way the question might have been brought to an early issue.--Since that information was filed he was informed that Messrs Laird had received an intimation that it was now necessary to send out a commission abroad four months after the seizure for the purpose of collecting evidence. He thought the production of the correspondence between England and the United States on the subject of those seizures could have no sort of bearing upon the case about to be brought before the courts, that case being simply whether Messrs. Laird had or had not in constructing these vessels infringed the municipal laws of England. He reminded Lord Russell that the papers he objected to produce had already been made public in America, and laid before Congress. What he wanted to see now was the English as well as the American version. Earl Derby read c
Seward (search for this): article 7
stances attending the capture of certain British vessels — the Springbok, the barque science, captured at Metamores ship Margaret and Jessie, and Saxon, captured within the jurisdiction of the Colony of the Cape of Good Hope. He gave a detail of the circumstances under which the vessels in question were captured, and with regard to the murder of one of the crew of the Saken by a Federal Lieutenant. He declared that if all Earl Russell had done in the matter had been to exp an opinion to Mr. Seward that the offending officer ought to be put upon his trial for murder, such conduct was utterly us worthy of Great Britain. He concluded by moving for the correspondence which had taken place with the American Government on the subject. The Attorney-General opposed the motion stating that the principles of graze adjudication in America were the same as in England, and the disposition of the Government very fair and just. Lord strongly supported Mr. on the ground that the practi
Maffit (search for this): article 7
teamer, of course, will act in conjunction with the Federal cruisers now on the look out for the Alabama. We may here repeat that this action on the part of British merchants is prompted by heavy combined and personal losses in the destruction of neutral goods in American bottoms and also by the fact that hitherto all the efforts of the Federal navy to capture the Alabama have been fruitions. -- Slavery Reporter. The London Post, of the 11th inst, speaking of the departure of the privateer Florida from Brest, sayer Intelligence was received at Liverpool yesterday afternoon to the effect that the Confederate cruiser Florida, under the command of Capt Maffit, left Brest on Tuesday night, in the midst of a dancing, on a cruise. We understand that the United States war steamer Kearsarge, on being apprised of the Florida's sailing, stood out to sea the same evening, so that there is every possibility of a fight between the two vessels should they chance to get foul of each other.
Adams (search for this): article 7
been compelled by the menaces and pressure placed upon them by the United States to make concessions which they had refused to make in the first instance. In addition to the correspondence in reference to the Alabama and the steam rams, he wished also to have a copy laid before Parliament of any correspondence that may have taken place in reference to acts of violence committed by American cruisers upon English vessels. Alluding to the threat of the American Government, in a dispatch to Mr. Adams. to follow such vessels as the Alabama and the Florida into British waters and seize them, even if under the protection of the British flag, he said the dispatch although not officially communicated to Her Majesty's Government, had nevertheless been laid before Congress, and it was expedient that we should come to a thorough understanding with the American Government on the subject. Earl Russell said the rams built at Birkeshead had been seized because there was reason to believe tha
20th (search for this): article 7
Interesting Foreign news. The European news, to the 20th ult., is interesting, and we give below some extracts: The Alabama and the steam rams in Parliament. In the House of Lorde, on the 11th of February, the Earl of Derby, in asking Lord Russell to produce the correspondence between her Majesty's Government and the United States in reference to the Alabama and other vessels built in England, from which the United States apprehended injury, said: The noble Lord had refused to lay on the table the correspondence with regard to the rams built in the Mersey, on the ground that they were now under judicial consideration. He understood that the rams were detained by an order of the Government in September, and that they were seized in October, From that time to the 6th February no steps were taken to obtain a judicial decision as to the legality of the seizure. On that day an information was filed which might have been filed in October or November, and in that way the
February 11th (search for this): article 7
Interesting Foreign news. The European news, to the 20th ult., is interesting, and we give below some extracts: The Alabama and the steam rams in Parliament. In the House of Lorde, on the 11th of February, the Earl of Derby, in asking Lord Russell to produce the correspondence between her Majesty's Government and the United States in reference to the Alabama and other vessels built in England, from which the United States apprehended injury, said: The noble Lord had refused to lay on the table the correspondence with regard to the rams built in the Mersey, on the ground that they were now under judicial consideration. He understood that the rams were detained by an order of the Government in September, and that they were seized in October, From that time to the 6th February no steps were taken to obtain a judicial decision as to the legality of the seizure. On that day an information was filed which might have been filed in October or November, and in that way the q
June, 2 AD (search for this): article 7
en her Majesty's Government and the United States in reference to the Alabama and other vessels built in England, from which the United States apprehended injury, said: The noble Lord had refused to lay on the table the correspondence with regard to the rams built in the Mersey, on the ground that they were now under judicial consideration. He understood that the rams were detained by an order of the Government in September, and that they were seized in October, From that time to the 6th February no steps were taken to obtain a judicial decision as to the legality of the seizure. On that day an information was filed which might have been filed in October or November, and in that way the question might have been brought to an early issue.--Since that information was filed he was informed that Messrs Laird had received an intimation that it was now necessary to send out a commission abroad four months after the seizure for the purpose of collecting evidence. He thought the product
November (search for this): article 7
noble Lord had refused to lay on the table the correspondence with regard to the rams built in the Mersey, on the ground that they were now under judicial consideration. He understood that the rams were detained by an order of the Government in September, and that they were seized in October, From that time to the 6th February no steps were taken to obtain a judicial decision as to the legality of the seizure. On that day an information was filed which might have been filed in October or November, and in that way the question might have been brought to an early issue.--Since that information was filed he was informed that Messrs Laird had received an intimation that it was now necessary to send out a commission abroad four months after the seizure for the purpose of collecting evidence. He thought the production of the correspondence between England and the United States on the subject of those seizures could have no sort of bearing upon the case about to be brought before the cour
1 2 3