hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity (current method)
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
Abraham Lincoln 38 0 Browse Search
United States (United States) 36 0 Browse Search
Gen Polk 26 2 Browse Search
Heth 22 10 Browse Search
Seward 14 6 Browse Search
Sherman 12 0 Browse Search
William Thomas 12 0 Browse Search
Mexico (Mexico, Mexico) 12 0 Browse Search
A. Perrin 11 1 Browse Search
Mary Davis 11 1 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: March 9, 1864., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 73 total hits in 38 results.

1 2 3 4
dent to touch the independent mashes of the people their true line of action. The field in open and the course is clear for the election of General Grant as the people's candidate, and it will require only a little initiatory public here and there to secure for him the inside track. Let the ball be put in motion, and it will seen gain a mountain which will carry everything before it. The destruction of the off Charleston. A letter in the Boston Herald, from off Charleston, the 18th ult., gives an account of the blowing up of the corvette by a Confederates torpedo steamer. The event took places about o'clock on one of the coldest nights of the winter. The letter says: A long object, just on the edge of the water, was discovered astern of the ship. In an the cable was slipped, the alarm sounded, and all hands beat to quarters, but before the ship had made any head way the torpedo exploded under has starboard quarter, making a most frightful report. The propelle
January 2nd (search for this): article 8
s letter, asks; "Is it not a strange, illustration of the condition of things that the question of who shall be allowed to preach in a church in St. Louis shall be decided by the President of the United States!" Now, all this sounds very strangely, and, wish, a little as if you gentlemen, making the application, do not understand the case alike, one affirming that his Doctor is enjoying all the rights of a civilian, and another pointing out to me what will secure the release! On the 2d of January last I wrote to Gen. Curtis in relation to Mr. Disk's order upon Dr. McPhesters, and, as I suppose, the Doctor is enjoying all the rights of a civilian, I only quote that part of my letter which relates to the church. It is as follows: "But I must add that the United Stated Government must not, as by this order, undertake to run the churches. When an individual, in a church or out of it, becomes dangerous to the public interest, he must be checked, but the churches, as such, must take
December 23rd, 1863 AD (search for this): article 8
es and the paymaster's safe will be recovered. She cannot be raised, as her stern is completely blown off, She was with coal and provisions, which will be a loss. Many of the survivors had quite large some of money laid away to send home by the next mail. The loss to them is severe. Lincoln on running the The resent action of one of Lincoln's in Norfolk in taking charge of the churches there gives the following letter some interest: Executive Mansion, Washington, December 23, 1863. I have just looked over a petition signed by some three dozen citizens of St. Louis and their accompanying letter, one by yourself, one by a Mr. Nathan Rauney, and by a Mr. John D. Cealter--the whole relating to the Rev. Dr. McPhesters. The petition prays in the came of justices and mercy, that will restore Dr. McPhesters to all his rights. This gives no intimation as to what eccississtical rights are withdrawn. Your letter states that Provost Marshal Dick, about a year
James Buchanan (search for this): article 8
scorching manifesto of Senator Pomeroy and his committee against Abraham Lincoln as a candidate for another term, and in favor of Mr. Chase for the succession, threatens, from present appearances, a rupture between the President and his ambitious Secretary. The spectacle of such a conflict for the Presidency is certainly a new thing under the sun, and somewhat discreditable withal to the belligerents. Not one of Mr. Lincoln's predecessors, excepting, perhaps, that imbecile old man, James Buchanan, would have tolerated for another day the presence of such a rival as Mr. Chase among his official subordinates after the discovery of such a declaration of war as this no quarter manifesto of Senator Pomercy. We are not surprised, therefore, to hear that the probabilities of a change or two in the Cabinet are beginning to be discussed among politicians at Washington. As between Mr. Lincoln and Mr. Chase, the Cabinet is now a nondescript with two heads, and it is doubtful which is or w
Simon Cameron (search for this): article 8
me show of strength from various State Legislatures; but while New York and Ohio stand dead against him his footing is insecure. How the States endorsing him have been manipulated may be connected from the operendt adopted in Pennsylvania Hon. Simon Cameron manages the Republicans in the Legislature of that State as the colonel of a regiment controls his men. With the statement, therefore, after the vote of confidence in Abraham Lincoln given by the Pennsylvania Legislature, that Mr. Cameron Mr. Cameron is to stand for our next Vice President on the Lincoln ticket, we get at the milk in that coconut. But all these nice manipulations will be apt to fall in the party convention.--The President wishes an immense amount of patronage, and has a host of office holding retainers in his service; but, as the "outs" are more numerous than the "ins," and as the "outs" have little to expect from the Administration as it is, they will suster all their strength in demanding a change. The result will most
I only quote that part of my letter which relates to the church. It is as follows: "But I must add that the United Stated Government must not, as by this order, undertake to run the churches. When an individual, in a church or out of it, becomes dangerous to the public interest, he must be checked, but the churches, as such, must take care of themselves. It will not do for the United States to appoint trustees, supervisors, or other agents, for the churches." This letter going to General Carlis, then in command, I supposed, of course, it was obeyed, especially as I heard no further complaint from Dr. Mc or his friends for nearly an entire year. I have never interfered, not thought of interfering, as to who shall or shall not preach in any church; nor have I knowingly or be livingly intreated any one else so to interferes by any authority. If any one is so interfering by color of my authority, I would like to have it specifically made known to me. If, after all, what is n
John D. Cealter (search for this): article 8
quite large some of money laid away to send home by the next mail. The loss to them is severe. Lincoln on running the The resent action of one of Lincoln's in Norfolk in taking charge of the churches there gives the following letter some interest: Executive Mansion, Washington, December 23, 1863. I have just looked over a petition signed by some three dozen citizens of St. Louis and their accompanying letter, one by yourself, one by a Mr. Nathan Rauney, and by a Mr. John D. Cealter--the whole relating to the Rev. Dr. McPhesters. The petition prays in the came of justices and mercy, that will restore Dr. McPhesters to all his rights. This gives no intimation as to what eccississtical rights are withdrawn. Your letter states that Provost Marshal Dick, about a year ago, ordered the arrest of Dr. McPhesters, pastor of the Vine Street Church prohibited him from officiating, and placed the management of the affairs of the church out of the control of its chos
roy and his committee against Abraham Lincoln as a candidate for another term, and in favor of Mr. Chase for the succession, threatens, from present appearances, a rupture between the President and h old man, James Buchanan, would have tolerated for another day the presence of such a rival as Mr. Chase among his official subordinates after the discovery of such a declaration of war as this no qunet are beginning to be discussed among politicians at Washington. As between Mr. Lincoln and Mr. Chase, the Cabinet is now a nondescript with two heads, and it is doubtful which is or will turn outs will be brought to bear against him which will insure his defeat. In other words, the radical Chase faction will not accept Mr. Lincoln as their candidate, but will combine with his enemies to defeat him, if nominated over the head of Mr. Chase. The radical Abolition Border State Convention which met at Louisville the other, day closed its proceedings with a set of anti Lincoln resolutions.
cississtical rights are withdrawn. Your letter states that Provost Marshal Dick, about a year ago, ordered the arrest of Dr. McPhesters, pastor of the Vine Street Church prohibited him from officiating, and placed the management of the affairs of the church out of the control of its chosen and near the close you state that a certain course "would insure his release." Mr. Ranney's letter says: "Dr. Samuel McPhesters is enjoying all the rights of a civilian, but cannot preach the Gospel!" Mr. Coalter, in his letter, asks; "Is it not a strange, illustration of the condition of things that the question of who shall be allowed to preach in a church in St. Louis shall be decided by the President of the United States!" Now, all this sounds very strangely, and, wish, a little as if you gentlemen, making the application, do not understand the case alike, one affirming that his Doctor is enjoying all the rights of a civilian, and another pointing out to me what will secure the release! O
strange, illustration of the condition of things that the question of who shall be allowed to preach in a church in St. Louis shall be decided by the President of the United States!" Now, all this sounds very strangely, and, wish, a little as if you gentlemen, making the application, do not understand the case alike, one affirming that his Doctor is enjoying all the rights of a civilian, and another pointing out to me what will secure the release! On the 2d of January last I wrote to Gen. Curtis in relation to Mr. Disk's order upon Dr. McPhesters, and, as I suppose, the Doctor is enjoying all the rights of a civilian, I only quote that part of my letter which relates to the church. It is as follows: "But I must add that the United Stated Government must not, as by this order, undertake to run the churches. When an individual, in a church or out of it, becomes dangerous to the public interest, he must be checked, but the churches, as such, must take care of themselves. It will
1 2 3 4