hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity (current method)
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 36 0 Browse Search
Sherman 17 1 Browse Search
R. E. Lee 16 0 Browse Search
Alabama (Alabama, United States) 10 0 Browse Search
North Carolina (North Carolina, United States) 10 0 Browse Search
A. G. Bennett 10 0 Browse Search
Payne 10 0 Browse Search
Grant 9 1 Browse Search
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) 8 0 Browse Search
South Carolina (South Carolina, United States) 8 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: March 3, 1865., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 10 total hits in 5 results.

November, 2 AD (search for this): article 2
The London correspondent (February 11) of the New York Tribune says that no sick oysters could have opened more quietly than Parliament on its seventh and last session. Whether the consciousness of its impending dissolution affected its spirits, whether the members were under the influence of the weather, or whether they are reserving themselves for more appropriate opportunities, quien sabe? Pope's Goddess of Dullness was prevalent. Of all the barren Queen's speeches that ever were delivered — and that is saying a good deal --the last is probably the barrenest. We are interested in it (says the correspondent) only so far as it quietly scatters to the winds all the foolish rumors of "recognition"by the utterance of the cold word "neutrality "--which might be stereotyped for future use until there shall be no further occasion. We cannot understand how a speech can be considered "barren," in the United States, which contains that consoling assurance. The correspondent t
Palmerston (search for this): article 2
nt treats Her Majesty with irreverence and ingratitude. It is obvious that all the pains taken to impress the United States with a sense of the obligations incurred by British neutrality are thrown away. We would like to learn, by the way, where all these foolish rumors of "recognition" come from. We have had them now for nearly four years. Almost every month in that time, one of them starts up and soars aloft; and no sooner is it fairly on the wing than that double-barrel shot-gun, Palmerston-Russell, brings it headlong to the earth. So far as we are concerned, it is a piece of refined cruelty to palm such stories upon the public. There is no more chance of British intervention — there never has been since the beginning of this quarrel — than there is of the intervention of the man in the moon. We have got along thus far without it, and expect to do so to the end of the chapter. A Government which has spent a great deal of time and money in getting up the American war is no
Pope (search for this): article 2
The London correspondent (February 11) of the New York Tribune says that no sick oysters could have opened more quietly than Parliament on its seventh and last session. Whether the consciousness of its impending dissolution affected its spirits, whether the members were under the influence of the weather, or whether they are reserving themselves for more appropriate opportunities, quien sabe? Pope's Goddess of Dullness was prevalent. Of all the barren Queen's speeches that ever were delivered — and that is saying a good deal --the last is probably the barrenest. We are interested in it (says the correspondent) only so far as it quietly scatters to the winds all the foolish rumors of "recognition"by the utterance of the cold word "neutrality "--which might be stereotyped for future use until there shall be no further occasion. We cannot understand how a speech can be considered "barren," in the United States, which contains that consoling assurance. The correspondent tr
Russell (search for this): article 2
Her Majesty with irreverence and ingratitude. It is obvious that all the pains taken to impress the United States with a sense of the obligations incurred by British neutrality are thrown away. We would like to learn, by the way, where all these foolish rumors of "recognition" come from. We have had them now for nearly four years. Almost every month in that time, one of them starts up and soars aloft; and no sooner is it fairly on the wing than that double-barrel shot-gun, Palmerston-Russell, brings it headlong to the earth. So far as we are concerned, it is a piece of refined cruelty to palm such stories upon the public. There is no more chance of British intervention — there never has been since the beginning of this quarrel — than there is of the intervention of the man in the moon. We have got along thus far without it, and expect to do so to the end of the chapter. A Government which has spent a great deal of time and money in getting up the American war is not going t
United States (United States) (search for this): article 2
the foolish rumors of "recognition"by the utterance of the cold word "neutrality "--which might be stereotyped for future use until there shall be no further occasion. We cannot understand how a speech can be considered "barren," in the United States, which contains that consoling assurance. The correspondent treats Her Majesty with irreverence and ingratitude. It is obvious that all the pains taken to impress the United States with a sense of the obligations incurred by British neutralUnited States with a sense of the obligations incurred by British neutrality are thrown away. We would like to learn, by the way, where all these foolish rumors of "recognition" come from. We have had them now for nearly four years. Almost every month in that time, one of them starts up and soars aloft; and no sooner is it fairly on the wing than that double-barrel shot-gun, Palmerston-Russell, brings it headlong to the earth. So far as we are concerned, it is a piece of refined cruelty to palm such stories upon the public. There is no more chance of British