hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Sorting
You can sort these results in two ways:
- By entity
- Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
- By position
- As the entities appear in the document.
You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.
hide
Most Frequent Entities
The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.
Entity | Max. Freq | Min. Freq | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
187 BC | 5 | 5 | Browse | Search |
183 BC | 5 | 5 | Browse | Search |
184 BC | 5 | 5 | Browse | Search |
192 BC | 5 | 5 | Browse | Search |
188 BC | 3 | 3 | Browse | Search |
185 BC | 3 | 3 | Browse | Search |
189 BC | 3 | 3 | Browse | Search |
183 BC | 2 | 2 | Browse | Search |
192 BC | 2 | 2 | Browse | Search |
196 BC | 2 | 2 | Browse | Search |
View all entities in this document... |
Browsing named entities in Titus Livius (Livy), Ab Urbe Condita, books 38-39 (ed. Evan T. Sage, Ph.D.).
Found 64 total hits in 52 results.
192 BC (search for this): book 38, chapter 28
194 BC (search for this): book 38, chapter 28
199 BC (search for this): book 38, chapter 28
While this was going on in Asia thingsB.C. 189 were quiet in the other provinces. At RomeLivy now enumerates briefly events in Rome during the period occupied by the Aetolian and Galatian campaigns. The narrative thus supplements that of XXXVII. lii —lviii incl. the censors Titus Quinctius Flamininus and Marcus Claudius Marcellus chose the senate; as princeps senatusCf. XXXIV. xliv. 4 and the note. Scipio had received this distinction in 199 B.C. (when he had been one of the censors) and in 194 B.C. Publius Scipio Africanus was chosen for the third time; only four senators were passed over, none of whom had held curule
office. In the review of the equitesThe censors performed the function of revising the list of equites and removing from the list such individuals as the facts as they found them warranted. also the censorship was quite
lenient. Contracts were let for the building of a substructure above the AequimeliumNeither the meaning of the word nor the situation o
197 BC (search for this): book 39, chapter 28
In reply to this Philip followed a very different line of argument from that recently used against the Thessalians and Perrhaebians: With the Maroneans or with Eumenes, he said, I have no debate, but now, Romans, the debate is with you, from whom I have for some time observed that I receive no fair treatment.
The cities of the Macedonians which had revolted from me during the trucePossibly the truce of 197 B.C. (XXXII. xxxvi. 8), but the revolt has not been mentioned before. I deemed it right that I should recover, not because it would be an important addition to my kingdom —for they are small towns and, moreover, situated on theB.C. 185 farthest frontiers —but because it was a valuable precedent for holding within bounds the other Macedonians.
This was refused me. During the Aetolian war, ordered by the consul Manius Acilius to besiege Lamia, after I had been wearied for a long time by the siege and battles and when I was on the point of scaling the walls, I was re
196 BC (search for this): book 38, chapter 3
197 BC (search for this): book 39, chapter 3
In Gaul the praetor Marcus Furius, seeking in peace the appearance of war, had disarmed the Cenomani,The Cenomani had been quiet since their defeat by Cethegus in 197 B.C. (XXXIII. xxiii. 4). who had given no provocation:
they inB.C. 187 consequence laid a complaint about this before the senate at Rome, and were referred to the consul Aemilius, whom the senate had authorized to investigate and decide, and after engaging in great contention with the praetor won their case.
The praetor was ordered to restore their arms to the Cenomani and to leave the province.
Then ambassadors from the allies of the Latin confederacy, who had assembled from all Latium in great numbers from every side, were granted an audience by the senate. When they complained that a great number of their citizens had migrated to Rome and had been assessed there,The allied cities and the Latin colonies, whose status was similar, were under obligations to Rome, in accordance with their several tre
204 BC (search for this): book 39, chapter 3
189 BC (search for this): book 38, chapter 30
192 BC (search for this): book 38, chapter 31
195 BC (search for this): book 38, chapter 31
xxiv. 6 and the note. —summoned it at Argos. When it was clear that almost all would assemble there, the consul, although he favoured the cause of the Aegians, also went to Argos; when the argument had begun there and he saw that the Aegian case was weaker, he gave up his purpose.Fulvius had evidently intended to oppose the proposal of Philopoemen at the meeting.
Then the Lacedaemonians diverted his attention to their own quarrels.In 195 B.C. Flamininus had concluded a treaty withB.C. 189 Nabis, tyrant of Lacedaemon, in which it was provided, among other things, that Nabis should surrender his holdings on the coast (XXXIV. xxxv —xxxvi); the Achaean League had assumed, without explicit authority, so far as the evidence shows, the enforcement of this provision when, in 192 B.C., Nabis had undertaken to obtain an outlet to the sea (XXXV. xxv —xxx). After the assassination of Nabis by the Aetolians in the same year, Philopoemen had taken Lacedaemon into the Achaean League (XXX<