hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
Braxton Bragg 20 0 Browse Search
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) 14 0 Browse Search
John A. Worsham 14 0 Browse Search
Rosecrans 12 0 Browse Search
England (United Kingdom) 12 0 Browse Search
Dick 12 0 Browse Search
Wheeler 12 2 Browse Search
Russell 10 0 Browse Search
Lookout Mountain, Tenn. (Tennessee, United States) 8 0 Browse Search
Riley 8 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: October 24, 1863., [Electronic resource].

Found 485 total hits in 229 results.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ...
a party to the war.--It is a principle of international law that neutrals shall not furnish troops, arms, or ammunition to either of the belligerents. This principle has always been disregarded since the commencement of this war. We are in no condition to go to war. But it is our deliberate opinion that the proposed action of Russell, if carried out, would furnish ample ground for an instantaneous declaration of war. The explanation of Russell's conduct lies in a nutshell. 1st. He is afraid of the Yankees; and 2d. He wishes them to subjugate us because we are slaveholders. His speech betrays the operation of these two motives as clearly as if he had declared it in so many words. --That he is our deadly enemy, cannot be concealed or denied. That he is the tool of Adams, is quite as evident. The British Parliament overthrew a Ministry four years ago because it allowed itself to be dictated to by Napoleon. We shall see whether they will pass a law at the dictation of Adams.
Russell's speech at Blairgowrie. --The pretensions of Great Britain to supremacy upon the ocean have been, ever since the battle of La Hague, in 1699, a subject of constant irritation and annoyly abandoned, and the doctrine established that a blockade, to be respected, must be effectual. Russell himself afterwards put a gloss upon this clause of the treaty, which rendered its meaning so plose they should say that they are French property, and bound for a French port. What right can Russell have to inquire into their farther destination, and how will the French Emperor relish such inq are in no condition to go to war. But it is our deliberate opinion that the proposed action of Russell, if carried out, would furnish ample ground for an instantaneous declaration of war. The explanation of Russell's conduct lies in a nutshell. 1st. He is afraid of the Yankees; and 2d. He wishes them to subjugate us because we are slaveholders. His speech betrays the operation of these
al in his opinion, until it was enlightened by his late speech. It is evident now that, apart from a disgraceful fear of Adams and the Yankees, who seem to dictate the foreign policy of Great Britain at this moment — he is actuated by a desire to rreassert the right. With regard to the iron-clads it is even more evident that his whole course has been dictated by Adams. If there be no law to prevent their sailing he intends to make Parliament pass one. Now, these vessels belong to Frence had declared it in so many words. --That he is our deadly enemy, cannot be concealed or denied. That he is the tool of Adams, is quite as evident. The British Parliament overthrew a Ministry four years ago because it allowed itself to be dictate denied. That he is the tool of Adams, is quite as evident. The British Parliament overthrew a Ministry four years ago because it allowed itself to be dictated to by Napoleon. We shall see whether they will pass a law at the dictation of Adams.
Russell's speech at Blairgowrie. --The pretensions of Great Britain to supremacy upon the ocean have been, ever since the battle of La Hague, in 1699, a subject of constant irritation and annoyance to all the independent nations of the earth. They produced the armed coalition of the Northern powers, with the Empress Catherine at their head, during our first revolution. They led to the bombardment of Copenhagen in 1801, and to the infamous assault upon the same city in 1807, when the whole Danish fleet was taken possession of, in a time of profound peace between Denmark and Great Britain, merely because the British Ministry thought it might possibly be used by the French. Immediately before this occurrence, by a mere Order in Council, the British Ministry declared the whole coast of France, which at that time extended from the mouth of the Elbe, in the North Sea, to the port of Trieste, on the Adriatic, in a state of blockade, although the combined fleet of the whole world coul
Russell's speech at Blairgowrie. --The pretensions of Great Britain to supremacy upon the ocean have been, ever since the battle of La Hague, in 1699, a subject of constant irritation and annoyance to all the independent nations of the earth. They produced the armed coalition of the Northern powers, with the Empress Catherine at their head, during our first revolution. They led to the bombardment of Copenhagen in 1801, and to the infamous assault upon the same city in 1807, when the whole Danish fleet was taken possession of, in a time of profound peace between Denmark and Great Britain, merely because the British Ministry thought it might possibly be used by the French. Immediately before this occurrence, by a mere Order in Council, the British Ministry declared the whole coast of France, which at that time extended from the mouth of the Elbe, in the North Sea, to the port of Trieste, on the Adriatic, in a state of blockade, although the combined fleet of the whole world coul
England (United Kingdom) (search for this): article 1
Russell's speech at Blairgowrie. --The pretensions of Great Britain to supremacy upon the ocean have been, ever since the battle of La Hague, in 1699, a subjecet was taken possession of, in a time of profound peace between Denmark and Great Britain, merely because the British Ministry thought it might possibly be used by tnt of coast, and although before many of the ports included in that circuit Great Britain had not at the time, and had never had, a single ship of war. The abuses whul fear of Adams and the Yankees, who seem to dictate the foreign policy of Great Britain at this moment — he is actuated by a desire to resume the old claim of GreaGreat Britain--the right to establish paper blockades of whole coasts — and that he thinks this a good opportunity to induce the Yankees to abandon their opposition to ir destination is a matter for the Emperor, not the Parliament and courts of Great Britain to consider. So far it is clear enough that the builders of these vess
Copenhagen (Denmark) (search for this): article 1
Russell's speech at Blairgowrie. --The pretensions of Great Britain to supremacy upon the ocean have been, ever since the battle of La Hague, in 1699, a subject of constant irritation and annoyance to all the independent nations of the earth. They produced the armed coalition of the Northern powers, with the Empress Catherine at their head, during our first revolution. They led to the bombardment of Copenhagen in 1801, and to the infamous assault upon the same city in 1807, when the whole Danish fleet was taken possession of, in a time of profound peace between Denmark and Great Britain, merely because the British Ministry thought it might possibly be used by the French. Immediately before this occurrence, by a mere Order in Council, the British Ministry declared the whole coast of France, which at that time extended from the mouth of the Elbe, in the North Sea, to the port of Trieste, on the Adriatic, in a state of blockade, although the combined fleet of the whole world coul
Trieste (Italy) (search for this): article 1
ment of Copenhagen in 1801, and to the infamous assault upon the same city in 1807, when the whole Danish fleet was taken possession of, in a time of profound peace between Denmark and Great Britain, merely because the British Ministry thought it might possibly be used by the French. Immediately before this occurrence, by a mere Order in Council, the British Ministry declared the whole coast of France, which at that time extended from the mouth of the Elbe, in the North Sea, to the port of Trieste, on the Adriatic, in a state of blockade, although the combined fleet of the whole world could not effectually blockade so great an extent of coast, and although before many of the ports included in that circuit Great Britain had not at the time, and had never had, a single ship of war. The abuses which followed this paper blockade — the capture or interruption of American vessels bound on voyages to the ports declared to be blockaded — led to a series of retaliatory measures on the part of
Denmark (Denmark) (search for this): article 1
produced the armed coalition of the Northern powers, with the Empress Catherine at their head, during our first revolution. They led to the bombardment of Copenhagen in 1801, and to the infamous assault upon the same city in 1807, when the whole Danish fleet was taken possession of, in a time of profound peace between Denmark and Great Britain, merely because the British Ministry thought it might possibly be used by the French. Immediately before this occurrence, by a mere Order in Council, thDenmark and Great Britain, merely because the British Ministry thought it might possibly be used by the French. Immediately before this occurrence, by a mere Order in Council, the British Ministry declared the whole coast of France, which at that time extended from the mouth of the Elbe, in the North Sea, to the port of Trieste, on the Adriatic, in a state of blockade, although the combined fleet of the whole world could not effectually blockade so great an extent of coast, and although before many of the ports included in that circuit Great Britain had not at the time, and had never had, a single ship of war. The abuses which followed this paper blockade — the capture
France (France) (search for this): article 1
s, with the Empress Catherine at their head, during our first revolution. They led to the bombardment of Copenhagen in 1801, and to the infamous assault upon the same city in 1807, when the whole Danish fleet was taken possession of, in a time of profound peace between Denmark and Great Britain, merely because the British Ministry thought it might possibly be used by the French. Immediately before this occurrence, by a mere Order in Council, the British Ministry declared the whole coast of France, which at that time extended from the mouth of the Elbe, in the North Sea, to the port of Trieste, on the Adriatic, in a state of blockade, although the combined fleet of the whole world could not effectually blockade so great an extent of coast, and although before many of the ports included in that circuit Great Britain had not at the time, and had never had, a single ship of war. The abuses which followed this paper blockade — the capture or interruption of American vessels bound on voyag
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ...