hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 904 0 Browse Search
Henry Wilson 826 0 Browse Search
Chattanooga (Tennessee, United States) 460 14 Browse Search
A. P. Hill 440 54 Browse Search
Fredericksburg, Va. (Virginia, United States) 425 15 Browse Search
Vicksburg (Mississippi, United States) 417 3 Browse Search
R. H. Anderson 375 3 Browse Search
Chancellorsville (Virginia, United States) 300 0 Browse Search
Morris Island (South Carolina, United States) 297 1 Browse Search
James H. Lane 286 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events: Documents and Narratives, Volume 10. (ed. Frank Moore). Search the whole document.

Found 5,341 total hits in 548 results.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ...
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) (search for this): chapter 1
e amendment was rejected. Mr. Johnson, of Tennessee, demanded the yeas and nays on the question ips. On the twenty-seventh, Mr. Johnson, of Tennessee, addressed the Senate at length. He declarethe twentieth of July, 1861, Mr. Johnson, of Tennessee, introduced a bill making an appropriation t to leave it to the Senate. Mr. Johnson, of Tennessee, moved that the blank be filled by insertingimes, Hale, Harlan, Harris, Howe, Johnson of Tennessee, King, Lane of Indiana, Lane of Kansas, Lath Good Conduct in the Battle of Murfreesboro, Tennessee. In the Senate, on the eighth of January, good conduct at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tennessee, which was read twice and referred to the Mi good conduct at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tennessee, where they achieved a signal victory for ouas signally defeated and driven from the State of Tennessee. The amendment was agreed to, and the rhomas in the great and decisive victories in Tennessee. The resolution as amended was then passed.
Kansas (Kansas, United States) (search for this): chapter 1
ent would not effect the object. Mr. Lane, of Kansas, said, Confusion would ensue in the new regimepointed Mr. Wilson, Mr. Rice, and Mr. Lane, of Kansas, managers. In the House, on the twenty-fifth,an slavery in any of the States. Mr. Lane, of Kansas, moved to amend the amendment by adding to it,ay. The amendment was agreed to. Mr. Lane, of Kansas, moved to strike out all after the enacting clnrolment and draft. On motion of Mr. Lane, of Kansas, the yeas and nays were ordered on the amendmest — yeas, sixteen; nays, twenty. Mr. Lane, of Kansas, moved to strike out of the classes exempted, nt was opposed by Mr. Wilson, and Mr. Lane, of Kansas, and rejected. The substitute as amended was osed by Mr. King, Mr. Wilson, and Mr. Lane, of Kansas, and agreed to — yeas, twenty-four; nays, thir, Mr. Fessenden, Mr. Johnson, and Mr. Lane, of Kansas. On the fourteenth, the debate was resumed,mselves. I have noticed, said Mr. Pomeroy, of Kansas, that men who are arguing in the interest of s[14 more...]<
Minnesota (Minnesota, United States) (search for this): chapter 1
f Indiana, Mr. Lane, of Kansas, Mr. Rice, of Minnesota, and Mr. Latham, of California. Mr. Wilson a was stricken out. On motion of Mr. Rice, of Minnesota, the ninth section was so amended as to give eleven; nays, twenty-seven. Mr. Rice, of Minnesota, moved to amend the twentieth section at theearly two hours against it, and Mr. Rice, of Minnesota, indorsed to the fullest extent, all that ha In the Senate, July fifteenth, Mr. Rice, of Minnesota, introduced a bill authorizing the Secretaryork, opposed its passage. Mr. Wilkinson, of Minnesota, moved further to amend, that no part of the, or from harboring a slave. Mr. Rice, of Minnesota, proposed to amend Mr. Saulsbury's amendment the abuses complained of. Mr. Wilkinson, of Minnesota, was opposed to the bill, and in favor of thd do, and it ought to be done. Mr. Rice, of Minnesota, thought the nation must speedily acknowledgo the Judiciary Committee. Mr. Wilkinson, of Minnesota, hoped it would not be referred the resoluti[5 more...]
Wisconsin (Wisconsin, United States) (search for this): chapter 1
leave the question with them. Mr. Howe, of Wisconsin, moved to amend Mr. King's amendment, by strmpetent. After remarks by Mr. Doolittle, of Wisconsin, and Mr. Hale, of New-Hampshire, the vote wais supported the amendment, and Mr. Howe, of Wisconsin, Mr. Harlan, of Iowa, and Mr. Wilkinson, of . Simmons, of Rhode Island, and Mr. Howe, of Wisconsin, opposed the amendment. Mr. Howe could not chardson, of Illinois, and Mr. Doolittle, of Wisconsin, supported Mr. Cowan's amendment. Mr. Wilsowenty-fourth of February, 1863, Mr. Howe, of Wisconsin, from the Committee on Pensions, reported a vely, then next preceding. Mr. Eldridge, of Wisconsin, demanded the yeas and nays, and they were ogreed to another committee, and Mr. Howe, of Wisconsin, Mr. Morrill, of Maine, and Mr. Buckalew, ofs, and for other purposes. Mr. Eldridge, of Wisconsin, moved that the bill be laid upon the table.nth, the House, on motion of Mr. McIndoe, of Wisconsin, referred the bill to the Committee on Milit[1 more...]
Rhode Island (Rhode Island, United States) (search for this): chapter 1
nt of each session of Congress. Mr. Simmons, of Rhode Island, and Mr. Howe, of Wisconsin, opposed the amendmevania, opposed the amendment, and Mr. Browne, of Rhode Island, advocated it. On the twelfth, the consideration, Mr. Dunn, of Indiana, and Mr. G. H. Browne, of Rhode Island, were appointed managers. On the seventh of Julthis great battle of freedom. Mr. Sheffield, of Rhode Island, thought the law would put to a severe test the the fifteenth of December, 1863, Mr. Anthony, of Rhode Island, introduced a joint resolution expressive of the On the eighth of January, 1864, Mr. Sprague, of Rhode Island, from the Military Committee, reported it back wstead of three hundred dollars. Mr. Anthony, of Rhode Island, moved to amend the amendment by adding as a proe Senate, on the twenty-seventh, Mr, Anthony, of Rhode Island, from the Committee on Printing, to which it hadpointed Mr. Morgan, of New-York, Mr. Sprague, of Rhode Island, and Mr. Powell, of Kentucky, managers. Mr. Mor
Ohio (Ohio, United States) (search for this): chapter 1
as agreed to; but, on motion of Mr. Sherman, of Ohio, the appropriation was stricken out. On motion n a reward for their treason. Mr. Hutchins, of Ohio, moved to amend the proposition so that those c not less than five years. Mr. Shillabarger, of Ohio, moved to add, or who shall have, by actual ser seventeen; nays, twenty-three. Mr. Sherman, of Ohio, said: I am going to vote for the resolution, abe dismissed from the service. Mr. Bingham, of Ohio, moved to add, after the word officers, the worne ; but the amendment was lost. Mr. Blake, of Ohio, moved to substitute for the bill an amendment,henck, Mr. Odell, of New-York, Mr. Garfield, of Ohio, Mr. Mallory, of Kentucky, Mr. Blair, of Missouhe fifteenth of December, 1864, Mr. Schenck, of Ohio, reported from the Committee on Military Affairon the nineteenth of January, 1865, Mr. Cox, of Ohio, introduced a joint resolution, tendering the tng themselves to any condition. Mr. Wade, of Ohio, followed in an earnest and effective speech in[36 more...]
New York (New York, United States) (search for this): chapter 1
rovided for in the amendment. Mr. Harris, of New-York, expressed his surprise that the Senate shoul. McPherson, of Pennsylvania, Mr. Sherman, of New-York, Mr. Blake, of Ohio, and Mr. Kellogg, of Illimeasure with some amendments. Mr. Steele, of New-York, objected to the bill as one of a series of mAllister, of Pennsylvania, and Mr. Fenton, of New-York, managers on its part. The Senate, on the sa Mr. Schenck, Mr. Chandler, and Mr. Davis, of New-York, Mr. Anderson, of Kentucky, and Mr. W. J. AllFarnsworth, of Illinois, and Mr. Griswold, of New-York, were appointed. On the twenty-fifth, Mr. Mos, Mr. Pendleton, and Mr. Thomas T. Davis, of New-York, were appointed managers. The Senate, on thethe twenty-third of May, 1864, Mr. Morgan, of New-York, introduced a bill to prohibit the discharge wa, Mr. Holman, of Indiana, and Mr. Davis, of New-York, managers. On the third of March, Mr. Wilsania, Mr. Morris, of Ohio, and Mr. Kernan, of New-York, managers. Mr. Thayer reported to the Hous[37 more...]
Maryland (Maryland, United States) (search for this): chapter 1
e in his amendment the navy. Mr. Kennedy, of Maryland, was prepared to sustain the administration id the amendment was agreed to. Mr. Pearce, of Maryland, and Mr. King, of New-York, opposed its passaointed Mr. Blair, of Missouri, Mr. Thomas, of Maryland, and Mr. Hickman, of Pennsylvania, managers on Missouri, and four thousand five hundred in Maryland, heretofore authorized by the President of ths an invitation to all the slaves of the State of Maryland, who can do so, to resort to this camp, e amendment was agreed to. Mr. Kennedy, of Maryland, moved to amend, by adding, that the Presiden consideration of the bill, and Mr. Davis, of Maryland, moved to amend Mr. Stevens's amendment by ad the amendment was agreed to. Mr. Webster, of Maryland, moved to insert after the word certificate, ll. Amendments were offered by Mr. Davis, of Maryland, Mr. Morrill, Mr. Orth, Mr. Thomas, and Mr. Gs by congressional enactment. Mr. Harris, of Maryland, was fully convinced that this measure was pr[8 more...]
Maine (Maine, United States) (search for this): chapter 1
d in the army shall be preserved. Mr. Fessenden, of Maine, thought this amendment would not effect the object.ut, Mr. Ten Eyck of New-Jersey, and Mr. Fessenden of Maine. The question being taken by yeas and nays, resulteiminary actions of the Government. Mr. Fessenden of Maine would oppose postponement after that day, though he thought the proviso as proposed by the Senator from Maine, is one that we can all accept. Mr. Trumbull thoughe unjust, and should be modified. Mr. Fessenden, of Maine, said: I would do nothing that a civilized people ou in the Federal Government. Mr. S. C. Fessenden, of Maine, and Mr. Kelley, of Pennsylvania, advocated the measmmittee, and Mr. Howe, of Wisconsin, Mr. Morrill, of Maine, and Mr. Buckalew, of Pennsylvania, were appointed m nay, and the bill was not rejected. Mr. Blaine, of Maine, moved to strike out the two first sections, providinscientiously opposed to bearing arms. Mr. Pike, of Maine, moved to amend Mr. Stevens's amendment requiring th
Oklahoma (Oklahoma, United States) (search for this): chapter 1
ulsbury, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. Hendricks, Mr. Wilson, Mr. Richardson, Mr. Howard, Mr. McDougall, and Mr. Howe, and supported by Mr. Brown, and Mr. Lane, of Kansas. Mr. Doolittle moved to amend Mr. Brown's amendment by substituting for it a provision authorizing the Secretary of War to receive into the military service Indian tribes in treaty with the United States, to be employed as a part of the military force for the purpose of maintaining peace, and protecting from hostile incursion the Indian Territory, and other Territories where the hostile or invading force was in whole or in part composed of hostile Indians; and the amendment to the amendment was agreed to — yeas, twenty-four; nays, twelve. The amendment as amended was then rejected — yeas, ten; nays, twenty-nine. Mr. Wilson moved to amend by adding as a new section: That every person who should be drafted under calls thereafter made, and who should serve honorably for a period of one year, should receive a bounty of one hundred
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ...