hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity (current method)
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
France (France) 48 0 Browse Search
JAs 41 5 Browse Search
Penn 38 0 Browse Search
Jno 34 2 Browse Search
W. T. Smith 34 0 Browse Search
United States (United States) 32 0 Browse Search
Benjamin F. Butler 29 1 Browse Search
Featherstone 27 3 Browse Search
Stonewall Jackson 26 0 Browse Search
Thos 24 4 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: June 30, 1862., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 75 total hits in 33 results.

1 2 3 4
Charles Arthur Beauregard (search for this): article 1
have been surprised. But that such an order should have been issued by a soldier — by a man who had raised himself to the rank of a General — was a subject not less of astonishment than pain. He could not bring himself to believe that the Government of the United States would not, as soon as they had notice of the order, have stamped it with their consure and condemnation. Her Majesty's Government received a dispatch yesterday from Lord Lyons, enclosing a copy of the proclamation of General Beauregard, in which allusion was made to the order of General Butler. There was no objection to-day the dispatch on the table. With regard to the course the Government might think fit to take, that was a matter for their discussion; but he was persuaded that there was not a man in England who would not show the feeling so well expressed by Sir James Walsh and Mr. Gregory. The motion was then agreed to. Latest dispatches The latest dispatches, dated at London and Liverpool on
Picayune Butler (search for this): article 1
eign mediation in Americanaffairs.debate in the British Parliaments.Butler's infamous proclamationdenounced. of the French and Englishpress.&cented upon prior to the departure of the Etna from Liverpool. Butler's Rule in New Orleans — important debate in Parliament. The Lonf June 11, denounces in the strongest terms the proclamation of General Butler relative to the ladies of New Orleans. It regards it as the gr to the Federal army, and thinks the Government is bound to call Gen. Butler and have him court-martialed. Such an fact as that of Batler's,of Lords on the 13th of June Earl Carnarvon called attention to General Butler's proclamation relative to the ladies of New Orleans. He condee of Common Sir J. Walsh made inquiry as to the authenticity of General Butler's proclamation, which he denounced as repugnant to the feelings General Beauregard, in which allusion was made to the order of General Butler. There was no objection to-day the dispatch on the table. With
Clay (search for this): article 1
June 11, denounces in the strongest terms the proclamation of General Butler relative to the ladies of New Orleans. It regards it as the greatest insult that could be offered to the Federal army, and thinks the Government is bound to call Gen. Butler and have him court-martialed. Such an fact as that of Batler's, says the Post, if not promptly disavowed, would soon turn the scales finally and decisively in favor of the Confederate cause. In the House of Commons, on the 12th of June, Mr. Clay asked if the attention of the Government had been directed to the repeated interferences of the United States cruisers with British vessels in the West Indies, and particularly to the case of the steamer Circassian, captured in central waters, while bound from St. Thomas to Havana, and within twenty miles of port? Mr. Layard could not give an answer at present, the case of the Circassian being under consideration of the law officers of the Crown. Sir J. Elphinstone asked if the Go
J. Elphinstone (search for this): article 1
on the 12th of June, Mr. Clay asked if the attention of the Government had been directed to the repeated interferences of the United States cruisers with British vessels in the West Indies, and particularly to the case of the steamer Circassian, captured in central waters, while bound from St. Thomas to Havana, and within twenty miles of port? Mr. Layard could not give an answer at present, the case of the Circassian being under consideration of the law officers of the Crown. Sir J. Elphinstone asked if the Government had any information of a Federal steamer having fired into an English and a French steamer, killing the captain of the latter, news to that effect having been received at Lloyd's. Lord Palmerston had no information on the subject. In the House of Lords on the 13th of June Earl Carnarvon called attention to General Butler's proclamation relative to the ladies of New Orleans. He condemned it in severe terms, as without precedent in the annals of mar, an
England (search for this): article 1
oclamation, addressed to a force which had just captured a hostile city, was likely to lead to great brutality. He thought there was no defence for this proclamation, and be sincerely hoped the American Government would disavow it. With respect to the rumors of mediation, he was glad the question had been put, for such rumors were likely to lead to much mischief. Her Majesty's Government had made no proposal to France in reference thereto, and the French Government had made no proposal to England. Therefore there had been no communications of any kind on the subject between the two Governments. Without, however, giving any opinion as to the propriety of offering mediation at some future day if circumstances should prove favorable, he must say that the present time appeared to him most inopportune. He conceived that in the embittered state of feeling in America it would lead to no good, but retard the time for such an offer being favorably made. Earl Russell also said, in rep
Gregory (search for this): article 1
re was any truth in the mediation rumors. Lord Palmerston said that no communication had been received from the French Government, on the subject; and as to the British Government, they had no intention at present to offer mediation. Mr. Gregory deprecated any fussy or meddling interference in the affairs of foreign States, and entirely disapproved of the homilies which were continually being read to foreign Powers by her Majesty's Government. This, however, was an exceptional case. . With regard to the course the Government might think fit to take, that was a matter for their discussion; but he was persuaded that there was not a man in England who would not show the feeling so well expressed by Sir James Walsh and Mr. Gregory. The motion was then agreed to. Latest dispatches The latest dispatches, dated at London and Liverpool on the 14th June, say: The steamer Scotia's advices of two days fighting at Richmond were eagerly canvassed on Change in
Hapwood (search for this): article 1
sell also said, in reply to Lord Brongham, that now the American flag was not likely to be used for slivers, the attention of the French Government had been called to the probability of their resorting to the French flag; but no reply had been received. In the House of Common Sir J. Walsh made inquiry as to the authenticity of General Butler's proclamation, which he denounced as repugnant to the feelings of the nineteenth century, and moved for any correspondence on the subject. Mr. Hapwood asked if there was any truth in the mediation rumors. Lord Palmerston said that no communication had been received from the French Government, on the subject; and as to the British Government, they had no intention at present to offer mediation. Mr. Gregory deprecated any fussy or meddling interference in the affairs of foreign States, and entirely disapproved of the homilies which were continually being read to foreign Powers by her Majesty's Government. This, however, was an
Layard (search for this): article 1
, if not promptly disavowed, would soon turn the scales finally and decisively in favor of the Confederate cause. In the House of Commons, on the 12th of June, Mr. Clay asked if the attention of the Government had been directed to the repeated interferences of the United States cruisers with British vessels in the West Indies, and particularly to the case of the steamer Circassian, captured in central waters, while bound from St. Thomas to Havana, and within twenty miles of port? Mr. Layard could not give an answer at present, the case of the Circassian being under consideration of the law officers of the Crown. Sir J. Elphinstone asked if the Government had any information of a Federal steamer having fired into an English and a French steamer, killing the captain of the latter, news to that effect having been received at Lloyd's. Lord Palmerston had no information on the subject. In the House of Lords on the 13th of June Earl Carnarvon called attention to Gene
Lloyd (search for this): article 1
o the case of the steamer Circassian, captured in central waters, while bound from St. Thomas to Havana, and within twenty miles of port? Mr. Layard could not give an answer at present, the case of the Circassian being under consideration of the law officers of the Crown. Sir J. Elphinstone asked if the Government had any information of a Federal steamer having fired into an English and a French steamer, killing the captain of the latter, news to that effect having been received at Lloyd's. Lord Palmerston had no information on the subject. In the House of Lords on the 13th of June Earl Carnarvon called attention to General Butler's proclamation relative to the ladies of New Orleans. He condemned it in severe terms, as without precedent in the annals of mar, and asked if the Government had information of its authenticity, and if it had protested against it. He also asked if there was any truth in the rumors of the mediation of France and England. The success of su
George B. McClellan (search for this): article 1
deral levies can be raised, drilled and brought into the field. All this time the increasing debt on both sides and mutual hatred are tending to make a new Union more and more impracticable. The London News treats the defeat of General Banks as unimportant, and shows that it can have to serious effect upon the ultimate result of the campaign. The attack of the Confederates it regards as a raid and nothing more, and not in the slightest degree calculated to disconcert the plans of General McClellan. The news of the evacuation of Corinth was not received in time for its effect to be fully developed and commented upon prior to the departure of the Etna from Liverpool. Butler's Rule in New Orleans — important debate in Parliament. The London Post, of June 11, denounces in the strongest terms the proclamation of General Butler relative to the ladies of New Orleans. It regards it as the greatest insult that could be offered to the Federal army, and thinks the Government
1 2 3 4