hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Sorting
You can sort these results in two ways:
- By entity (current method)
- Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
- By position
- As the entities appear in the document.
You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.
hide
Most Frequent Entities
The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.
Entity | Max. Freq | Min. Freq | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Robert E. Lee | 25 | 1 | Browse | Search |
Francis P. Blair | 23 | 3 | Browse | Search |
United States (United States) | 18 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Henry S. Foote | 11 | 1 | Browse | Search |
Sherman | 9 | 1 | Browse | Search |
A. E. Dickinson | 9 | 1 | Browse | Search |
Jefferson Davis | 9 | 1 | Browse | Search |
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) | 8 | 0 | Browse | Search |
F. P. Blair | 8 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Missouri (Missouri, United States) | 8 | 0 | Browse | Search |
View all entities in this document... |
Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: January 20, 1865., [Electronic resource].
Found 532 total hits in 314 results.
August, 1 AD (search for this): article 1
1860 AD (search for this): article 2
From Charleston. [Correspondence of the Richmond Dispatch.] Charleston, January 10, 1865.
One is surprised and pained, on returning to Charleston after an absence of twelve months, to find many of the most furious advocates of secession in 1860, as well as many of the most confident and resolute supporters of our holy cause in 1863, now the most querulous, and despondent.
The reverses which have overtaken our arms, and the demoralizing influence of the blockade running trade, have wrought this great change, so that the Charleston of to-day is no longer the Charleston of former days.
The "cradle of the rebellion," the "hot-bed of secession," as the Yankees were wont to designate the town, and as the Charlestonians themselves were glad to have it designated, no longer presents the bold front with which it entered upon the conflict.
I do not mean to insinuate that the people of Charleston are canvassing the propriety of abandoning the contest and of running up the white flag
1863 AD (search for this): article 2
From Charleston. [Correspondence of the Richmond Dispatch.] Charleston, January 10, 1865.
One is surprised and pained, on returning to Charleston after an absence of twelve months, to find many of the most furious advocates of secession in 1860, as well as many of the most confident and resolute supporters of our holy cause in 1863, now the most querulous, and despondent.
The reverses which have overtaken our arms, and the demoralizing influence of the blockade running trade, have wrought this great change, so that the Charleston of to-day is no longer the Charleston of former days.
The "cradle of the rebellion," the "hot-bed of secession," as the Yankees were wont to designate the town, and as the Charlestonians themselves were glad to have it designated, no longer presents the bold front with which it entered upon the conflict.
I do not mean to insinuate that the people of Charleston are canvassing the propriety of abandoning the contest and of running up the white flag
1864 AD (search for this): article 6
The New York Millionaires.
--A letter from New York says:
We are in a fair way of finding out who are the wealthiest men in New York, according to their own affidavits before the internal revenue commissioners.
Some of these were specified in my letter of yesterday, and, as a matter of general interest, I append a few more:
Income for 1864.
A. T. Stewart.$1,843,639
Moses Taylor573,494
Ex-Mayor Opdyke112,800
Judge Roosevelt34,486
August Belmont100,930
W. H. Appleton65,147
Judge Betts.15,030
Ex-Collector Barney30,025
John D. Wolfe57,780
Daniel Drew101,290
Ex-Mayor Kingsland60,000
C. Delmonico70,650
Daniel Parrish62,768
S. L. Mitchell109,324
W. O'Briert.90,000
John O'Brien90,000
Rufus T. Andrews22,616
John Jacob Astor, Jr.20,504
John A. Stevens20,385
J. Sturges135,000
T. M.Taylor105,000
George Law68,444
Jordan L. Mott16,615
All these are in the Sixteenth, Eighteenth and Twenty-second Wards, comprising the Eighth District.
June, 1864 AD (search for this): article 2
The education of disabled soldiers and soldiers children — an important question. Richmond, Va., January 1, 1865.
At the annual meeting of the Baptist General Association of Virginia, in June, 1864, the following persons were appointed a committee to provide for the education of the children of deceased and disabled soldiers, namely: Colin Bass, Esq.; Wellington Goddin, Esq.; Rev. A. E. Dickinson, Hon. R. L. Montague, J. B. Jeter, D. D.; J. L. Burrows, D. D.; and W. F. Broaddus, D. D.
The committee have matured a plan of operations which, it is hoped, will greatly further the object.
They propose, not to originate schools, but to patronize such as now exist, or may hereafter be brought into existence; to limit their efforts, except in special cases, to aid in giving a good English education; and, in making their appropriations, to be controlled by neither sectarian, sectional nor social distinctions. It has been determined also to assist soldiers, disabled in the Confed
October 2nd, 1864 AD (search for this): article 1
December 16th, 1864 AD (search for this): article 1
Post Quartermaster's office,Confederate States of America, Salisbury, North Carolina, Dec. 16, 1864.
Negroes Wanted.--This Department wishes to hire, for the ensuing year, four Blacksmiths, two Wheelwrights, Six Carpenters, Seventy Wood-Cutters and Laborers;
for which will be paid a liberal price.
They will be well fed and supplied with good clothing.
Those having able-bodied negro men to hire may find it to their advantage to address. James M. Goodman, Captain and Post Quartermaster. de 21--1m.
December 22nd, 1864 AD (search for this): article 1
Richmond, December 22, 1864.
Negroes are not Allowed to pass the Intermediate line of Fortifications without a passport from this office.
No passport will be given a slave except on the written order of his owner; and if the handwriting of the owner be not well known at the office or attested properly, the owner must apply for the passport in prison.
This by the frequent appearance at the office of forged orders, and will be strictly observed. J. H. Carrington, Provost-Marshal. de 23--1m
January 1st, 1865 AD (search for this): article 2
The education of disabled soldiers and soldiers children — an important question. Richmond, Va., January 1, 1865.
At the annual meeting of the Baptist General Association of Virginia, in June, 1864, the following persons were appointed a committee to provide for the education of the children of deceased and disabled soldiers, namely: Colin Bass, Esq.; Wellington Goddin, Esq.; Rev. A. E. Dickinson, Hon. R. L. Montague, J. B. Jeter, D. D.; J. L. Burrows, D. D.; and W. F. Broaddus, D. D.
The committee have matured a plan of operations which, it is hoped, will greatly further the object.
They propose, not to originate schools, but to patronize such as now exist, or may hereafter be brought into existence; to limit their efforts, except in special cases, to aid in giving a good English education; and, in making their appropriations, to be controlled by neither sectarian, sectional nor social distinctions. It has been determined also to assist soldiers, disabled in the Confed
January 10th, 1865 AD (search for this): article 2
From Charleston. [Correspondence of the Richmond Dispatch.] Charleston, January 10, 1865.
One is surprised and pained, on returning to Charleston after an absence of twelve months, to find many of the most furious advocates of secession in 1860, as well as many of the most confident and resolute supporters of our holy cause in 1863, now the most querulous, and despondent.
The reverses which have overtaken our arms, and the demoralizing influence of the blockade running trade, have wrought this great change, so that the Charleston of to-day is no longer the Charleston of former days.
The "cradle of the rebellion," the "hot-bed of secession," as the Yankees were wont to designate the town, and as the Charlestonians themselves were glad to have it designated, no longer presents the bold front with which it entered upon the conflict.
I do not mean to insinuate that the people of Charleston are canvassing the propriety of abandoning the contest and of running up the white flag