hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
U. S. Grant 618 0 Browse Search
William T. Sherman 585 15 Browse Search
Charleston (South Carolina, United States) 560 2 Browse Search
Atlanta (Georgia, United States) 372 0 Browse Search
Joseph E. Johnston 333 11 Browse Search
George G. Meade 325 5 Browse Search
Winfield S. Hancock 321 3 Browse Search
Philip H. Sheridan 313 7 Browse Search
R. E. Lee 288 0 Browse Search
Jubal A. Early 278 6 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of Robert Underwood Johnson, Clarence Clough Buell, Battles and Leaders of the Civil War. Volume 4.. Search the whole document.

Found 105 total hits in 39 results.

1 2 3 4
Rutherford B. Hayes (search for this): chapter 16.108
Mississippi. I at once proceeded to Washington, and, after a personal interview with General Grant, received, on the 6th of May, an answer to my communications of the 9th and 22d of April, authorizing my publishing them, and stating the reasons for not granting me the investigation sought. General Warren resigned his volunteer commission May 27, 1865; he died Aug. 8, 1882, at Newport, R. I. A court of inquiry was finally granted to General Warren on the 9th of December, 1879, by President Hayes. As finally constituted, the court consisted of Brevet Major-Generals C. C. Augur and John Newton, and Brevet Lieutenant-Colonel Loomis L. Langdon, recorder. The inquiry related to four imputations contained in the final reports of Grant and Sheridan. First. General Grant wrote: In his Memoirs (C. L. Webster & Co., 1885), General Grant says: I was so munch dissatisfied with Warren's dilatory movements in the battle of White Oak road, and in his failure to reach Sheridan in t
Theodore S. Bowers (search for this): chapter 16.108
the command of the troops at the latter place and along the Southside Railroad, belonging to the Army of the Potomac. When these troops were relieved by troops from the Army of the James, I was left in Petersburg awaiting orders. I then addressed a letter, dated April 9th, to General Rawlins, chief-of-staff, soliciting an investigation. On the 22d of April I sent another, requesting permission to publish the first one, for the reasons set forth therein. On the 2d of May I telegraphed Colonel Bowers, adjutant-general, to ascertain if these had been received, and he answered, they were received, the latter during General Grant's absence. Orders have been sent you [me] to report here, when you can see the general. On May 3d I received by telegraph an extract from General Orders No. 78, of May 1st, assigning me to the command of the Department of the Mississippi. I at once proceeded to Washington, and, after a personal interview with General Grant, received, on the 6th of May, an
William Arthur (search for this): chapter 16.108
ssion that he wished the sun to go down before dispositions for the attack could be completed. The court found that there was no unnecessary delay in the march of the Fifth Corps, and that General Warren took the usual methods of a corps commander to prevent delay; and that his actions do not appear to have corresponded with such [a] wish as that imputed to him. Fourth. Sheridan says: In the engagement portions of his line gave way, when not exposed to a heavy fire, and simply for want of confidence on the part of the troops, which General Warren did not exert himself to inspire. The court found that Warren was exerting himself to remedy the divergence of Crawford and Griffin, after Ayres changed front to the left, and thinks this was for him the essential point to be attended to, which also exacted his whole efforts to accomplish. On the 21st of November, 1881, President Arthur directed that the findings and opinion be published. No other action was taken.--editors.
John A. Rawlins (search for this): chapter 16.108
so. I obeyed the order to report to General Grant that night, and was by him assigned to the command of the defenses at City Point and Bermuda Hundred. After the evacuation of Richmond and Petersburg I was given the command of the troops at the latter place and along the Southside Railroad, belonging to the Army of the Potomac. When these troops were relieved by troops from the Army of the James, I was left in Petersburg awaiting orders. I then addressed a letter, dated April 9th, to General Rawlins, chief-of-staff, soliciting an investigation. On the 22d of April I sent another, requesting permission to publish the first one, for the reasons set forth therein. On the 2d of May I telegraphed Colonel Bowers, adjutant-general, to ascertain if these had been received, and he answered, they were received, the latter during General Grant's absence. Orders have been sent you [me] to report here, when you can see the general. On May 3d I received by telegraph an extract from General
M. V. Sheridan (search for this): chapter 16.108
n of my corps during the night to support General Sheridan's cavalry, which had been forced back to enemy in sight. I personally sought of General Sheridan a reason for his order; but he would not,s contained in the final reports of Grant and Sheridan. First. General Grant wrote: In his Memf White Oak road, and in his failure to reach Sheridan in time, that I was very much afraid that at the last moment he would fail Sheridan. lie was a man of fine intelligence, great earnestness, quicesitate. It was upon that authorization that Sheridan removed Warren, I was very sorry that it had started earlier to the front. Second. General Sheridan says: Had Warren moved according to tacticable for the Fifth Corps to have reached Sheridan at 12 o'clock on the night of March 31st, as d Crawford at once, as ordered. Third. General Sheridan says: General Warren did not exert hih [a] wish as that imputed to him. Fourth. Sheridan says: In the engagement portions of his l[3 more...]
G. K. Warren (search for this): chapter 16.108
t granting me the investigation sought. General Warren resigned his volunteer commission May 27, A court of inquiry was finally granted to General Warren on the 9th of December, 1879, by Presidentefects, and to say that as much as I liked General Warren, now was not a time when we could let our upon that authorization that Sheridan removed Warren, I was very sorry that it had been done, and rsulting in a repulse. The court exonerated Warren, but held that he should have been with his adont. Second. General Sheridan says: Had Warren moved according to the expectations of the lieof March 31st, as Grant had expected; but that Warren should have moved Griffin and Crawford at onceered. Third. General Sheridan says: General Warren did not exert himself to get up his corps onfidence on the part of the troops, which General Warren did not exert himself to inspire. The court found that Warren was exerting himself to remedy the divergence of Crawford and Griffin, after[4 more...]
U. S. Grant (search for this): chapter 16.108
ive one, and declined to do so. I obeyed the order to report to General Grant that night, and was by him assigned to the command of the defeneceived, and he answered, they were received, the latter during General Grant's absence. Orders have been sent you [me] to report here, whene proceeded to Washington, and, after a personal interview with General Grant, received, on the 6th of May, an answer to my communications ofquiry related to four imputations contained in the final reports of Grant and Sheridan. First. General Grant wrote: In his Memoirs (C. General Grant wrote: In his Memoirs (C. L. Webster & Co., 1885), General Grant says: I was so munch dissatisfied with Warren's dilatory movements in the battle of White Oak roadGeneral Grant says: I was so munch dissatisfied with Warren's dilatory movements in the battle of White Oak road, and in his failure to reach Sheridan in time, that I was very much afraid that at the last moment he would fail Sheridan. lie was a man of have reached Sheridan at 12 o'clock on the night of March 31st, as Grant had expected; but that Warren should have moved Griffin and Crawfor
Gouverneur K. Warren (search for this): chapter 16.108
General Warren at five Forks, and the court of inquiry. On May 11th, 1865, General G. K. Warren, who was then in command of the Department of the Mississippi, addressed a letter to the New York times, in which he said: The operations of the enemy on the 31st of March made it necessary for me to send a portion of my corps during the night to support General Sheridan's cavalry, which had been forced back to near Dinwiddie Court House. One of my divisions was thus compelled to march all night, after having fought all day, and the rest of the corps moved toward the enemy that confronted the cavalry at daybreak. Our presence on the flank and rear of the enemy compelled him to fall back rapidly to the vicinity of the Five Forks, and General Sheridan, on advancing with the cavalry, found him slightly intrenched there. This force proved to be a complete division of the enemy's infantry, and all the cavalry of Lee's army. I received an order from General Meade, after joining
Romeyn B. Ayres (search for this): chapter 16.108
attack and turn the enemy's left flank on the White Oak road. My line was formed accordingly: Ayres on the left, in three lines of battle; Crawford on the right, in three lines of battle; and Grifdivision in reserve in masses. This occupied till 4 P. M. The forward movement then began. General Ayres's division became first engaged, wheeling to the left, from facing north to facing west, as it advanced. General Crawford's division also wheeled to the left on General Ayres's as on a pivot, but owing to the nature of the ground and forests, and the greater distance to gain, he lost his connection with General Ayres. Into the interval thus left General Griffin's division was placed. These two divisions steadily drove in the enemy's left flank. General Crawford's division moved ot found that Warren was exerting himself to remedy the divergence of Crawford and Griffin, after Ayres changed front to the left, and thinks this was for him the essential point to be attended to, wh
George G. Meade (search for this): chapter 16.108
compelled to march all night, after having fought all day, and the rest of the corps moved toward the enemy that confronted the cavalry at daybreak. Our presence on the flank and rear of the enemy compelled him to fall back rapidly to the vicinity of the Five Forks, and General Sheridan, on advancing with the cavalry, found him slightly intrenched there. This force proved to be a complete division of the enemy's infantry, and all the cavalry of Lee's army. I received an order from General Meade, after joining General Sheridan, to report to him for duty, which I did, and the corps was halted by his direction at the point where we joined him, about 8 A. M. [April 1st]. At 1 P. M. I was directed to bring up the corps to Gravelly Run Church, a distance of about two and three-fourths miles from where they had been halted, and there form with two divisions in front and one in reserve, so as to move with the whole corps, and attack and turn the enemy's left flank on the White Oak road
1 2 3 4