hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
Sherman 30 4 Browse Search
United States (United States) 28 0 Browse Search
Baker P. Lee 25 1 Browse Search
James Grant 24 0 Browse Search
Sheridan 20 0 Browse Search
Mexico (Mexico, Mexico) 16 0 Browse Search
France (France) 16 0 Browse Search
Wingfield Scott 14 0 Browse Search
Jefferson Davis 12 0 Browse Search
North Carolina (North Carolina, United States) 12 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: March 25, 1865., [Electronic resource].

Found 690 total hits in 367 results.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ...
ave been 7,555,423, instead of 19,987,573--a difference in population of 12,432,150. Extraordinary as this may appear, the author seems to have proved it by figures and facts which cannot readily be answered, and which show to our minds that the United States is no longer, and was not even as long ago as 1850, an American country. Another writer, of opposite political views, testifies to the wonderful increase of the foreign element in the Northern States since 1850. For a single year, 1853, the aggregate immigration of the United States, by land and sea, was not short of half a million of souls. At that rate, there arrived in this country every year a sufficient number of persons to make a State embracing as large a white population as Maryland or Alabama, and, within a fraction, enough to make one having as large a white population as North Carolina or Georgia! Every two years, there would be enough to balance the white population of Virginia. Every six months, there would
Alabama (Alabama, United States) (search for this): article 2
er, and was not even as long ago as 1850, an American country. Another writer, of opposite political views, testifies to the wonderful increase of the foreign element in the Northern States since 1850. For a single year, 1853, the aggregate immigration of the United States, by land and sea, was not short of half a million of souls. At that rate, there arrived in this country every year a sufficient number of persons to make a State embracing as large a white population as Maryland or Alabama, and, within a fraction, enough to make one having as large a white population as North Carolina or Georgia! Every two years, there would be enough to balance the white population of Virginia. Every six months, there would be almost enough to offset South Carolina or Louisiana. Every five weeks, a sufficient number to act as a counterpoise to the entire white population of Florida. Or, at the same rate, making no allowance for the increase of immigration, though, in point of fact, it ha
Georgia (Georgia, United States) (search for this): article 2
ews, testifies to the wonderful increase of the foreign element in the Northern States since 1850. For a single year, 1853, the aggregate immigration of the United States, by land and sea, was not short of half a million of souls. At that rate, there arrived in this country every year a sufficient number of persons to make a State embracing as large a white population as Maryland or Alabama, and, within a fraction, enough to make one having as large a white population as North Carolina or Georgia! Every two years, there would be enough to balance the white population of Virginia. Every six months, there would be almost enough to offset South Carolina or Louisiana. Every five weeks, a sufficient number to act as a counterpoise to the entire white population of Florida. Or, at the same rate, making no allowance for the increase of immigration, though, in point of fact, it has progressively and rapidly increased every year, the foreign immigration in thirteen years (1866) would be
Louisiana (Louisiana, United States) (search for this): article 2
, by land and sea, was not short of half a million of souls. At that rate, there arrived in this country every year a sufficient number of persons to make a State embracing as large a white population as Maryland or Alabama, and, within a fraction, enough to make one having as large a white population as North Carolina or Georgia! Every two years, there would be enough to balance the white population of Virginia. Every six months, there would be almost enough to offset South Carolina or Louisiana. Every five weeks, a sufficient number to act as a counterpoise to the entire white population of Florida. Or, at the same rate, making no allowance for the increase of immigration, though, in point of fact, it has progressively and rapidly increased every year, the foreign immigration in thirteen years (1866) would be (we have no doubt it is at this moment) equal to the entire white population of the slave States! Six out of seven of these immigrants settled in the free States. Fa
Maryland (Maryland, United States) (search for this): article 2
s is no longer, and was not even as long ago as 1850, an American country. Another writer, of opposite political views, testifies to the wonderful increase of the foreign element in the Northern States since 1850. For a single year, 1853, the aggregate immigration of the United States, by land and sea, was not short of half a million of souls. At that rate, there arrived in this country every year a sufficient number of persons to make a State embracing as large a white population as Maryland or Alabama, and, within a fraction, enough to make one having as large a white population as North Carolina or Georgia! Every two years, there would be enough to balance the white population of Virginia. Every six months, there would be almost enough to offset South Carolina or Louisiana. Every five weeks, a sufficient number to act as a counterpoise to the entire white population of Florida. Or, at the same rate, making no allowance for the increase of immigration, though, in point of
North Carolina (North Carolina, United States) (search for this): article 2
te political views, testifies to the wonderful increase of the foreign element in the Northern States since 1850. For a single year, 1853, the aggregate immigration of the United States, by land and sea, was not short of half a million of souls. At that rate, there arrived in this country every year a sufficient number of persons to make a State embracing as large a white population as Maryland or Alabama, and, within a fraction, enough to make one having as large a white population as North Carolina or Georgia! Every two years, there would be enough to balance the white population of Virginia. Every six months, there would be almost enough to offset South Carolina or Louisiana. Every five weeks, a sufficient number to act as a counterpoise to the entire white population of Florida. Or, at the same rate, making no allowance for the increase of immigration, though, in point of fact, it has progressively and rapidly increased every year, the foreign immigration in thirteen years (1
South Carolina (South Carolina, United States) (search for this): article 2
he United States, by land and sea, was not short of half a million of souls. At that rate, there arrived in this country every year a sufficient number of persons to make a State embracing as large a white population as Maryland or Alabama, and, within a fraction, enough to make one having as large a white population as North Carolina or Georgia! Every two years, there would be enough to balance the white population of Virginia. Every six months, there would be almost enough to offset South Carolina or Louisiana. Every five weeks, a sufficient number to act as a counterpoise to the entire white population of Florida. Or, at the same rate, making no allowance for the increase of immigration, though, in point of fact, it has progressively and rapidly increased every year, the foreign immigration in thirteen years (1866) would be (we have no doubt it is at this moment) equal to the entire white population of the slave States! Six out of seven of these immigrants settled in the f
United States (United States) (search for this): article 2
In 1790, the population of the United States, including whites and free negroes, was 3,231,930. The whole population in 1850, of whites and free colored persons, was 19,987,573. From an interesting treatise, published by a foreigner in Washington, the remarkable fact appears to be demonstrated, that, excluding immigration, the population of the United States, in 1850, would have been 7,555,423, instead of 19,987,573--a difference in population of 12,432,150. Extraordinary as this mayr seems to have proved it by figures and facts which cannot readily be answered, and which show to our minds that the United States is no longer, and was not even as long ago as 1850, an American country. Another writer, of opposite political v of the foreign element in the Northern States since 1850. For a single year, 1853, the aggregate immigration of the United States, by land and sea, was not short of half a million of souls. At that rate, there arrived in this country every year a
It was said by some of Sheridan's troopers, in their late raid, that they did not care about taking Richmond; that Richmond, in fact, was a thing of very little consequence indeed; but that their object was to destroy the country, and thereby destroy General Lee's army. --When remonstrated with by families for taking their little household supplies, the answer was, that they meant to take them, so that they could not supply General Lee's army. For this, the people were plundered; for this, the mills were burned, as well as canals and railroads cut. They also expressed their astonishment at the amount of provisions they found in some parts of the interior. They had been told, they said, that we were in a state of starvation, but they found an abundance that they had not dreamed of. It needed not their declarations to inform us of their object. Richmond, they have discovered, is not the back bone of the rebellion. It is that army; that host of war-worn veterans who, for f
Baker P. Lee (search for this): article 3
ut taking Richmond; that Richmond, in fact, was a thing of very little consequence indeed; but that their object was to destroy the country, and thereby destroy General Lee's army. --When remonstrated with by families for taking their little household supplies, the answer was, that they meant to take them, so that they could not supply General Lee's army. For this, the people were plundered; for this, the mills were burned, as well as canals and railroads cut. They also expressed their astonishment at the amount of provisions they found in some parts of the interior. They had been told, they said, that we were in a state of starvation, but they found an ab on to their supplies and run the risk of being cleaned out by the Yankees, they have the right to make the election. If they wish to succeed they will send to General Lee's army every article not indispensable to their family use, and pour into the treasury every article of jewelry, of plate, of gold and silver in any form, which
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ...