hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
Farmington (Mississippi, United States) 389 39 Browse Search
G. T. Beauregard 161 7 Browse Search
John Pope 160 12 Browse Search
Booneville (Mississippi, United States) 146 14 Browse Search
Chattanooga (Tennessee, United States) 141 11 Browse Search
Pittsburg Landing (Tennessee, United States) 132 12 Browse Search
William Nelson 125 9 Browse Search
Henry W. Halleck 119 7 Browse Search
Purdy (Tennessee, United States) 108 6 Browse Search
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) 106 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies, Chapter XXII: Operations in Kentucky, Tennessee, North Mississippi, North Alabama, and Southwest Virginia. March 4-June 10, 1862. (ed. Lieut. Col. Robert N. Scott). Search the whole document.

Found 465 total hits in 302 results.

... 26 27 28 29 30 31
as rapidly as possible. The newspaper accounts that our divisions were surprised are utterly false. Every division had notice of the enemy's approach hours before the battle commenced. H. W. Halleck, Major-General. Hon. E. M. Stanton. Corinth, Miss., June 15, 1862. Sir: I transmit herewith a topographical map To appear in Atlas. of the plain of Shilohy showing the various positions occupied by our troops between Shiloh Church and Pittsburg Landing in the battle of April 6 and 7 last. This map has been made from careful surveys, and the positions of the various divisions are designated in the precise places which they occupied on the ground at the times indicated. It will enable the reader to understand the official reports of the battle which have already been forwarded to the War Department. It is not my object in this communication to offer any comments on the battle, beyond the remark that the impression which at one time seemed to have been received by the
April 13th, 1862 AD (search for this): chapter 22
28.-Col. Isaac L. Dunlop, Ninth Arkansas Infantry. No. 229.-Col. John A. Wharton, Texas Rangers (unattached). No. 1.-reports of Maj. Gen. Henry W. Halleck, U. S. Army, commanding the Department of the Misissisppi. Saint Louis, Mo., April 8, 1862. The enemy attacked our works at Pittsburg, Tenn., yesterday, but were repulsed with heavy loss. No details given. H. W. Halleck, Major-General Hon. E. M. Stanton. headquarters Department of the Mississippi, Pittsburg, Tenn., April 13, 1862. Sir: It is the unanimous opinion here that Brig. Gen. W. T. Sherman saved the fortune of the day on the 6th instant, and contributed largely to the glorious victory on the 7th. He was in the thickest of the fight on both days, having three horses killed under him and being wounded twice. I respectfully request that he be made a major-general of volunteers, to date from the 6th instant. Very respectfully, your obedient servant, H. W. Halleck, Major-General, Commanding. Hon.
... 26 27 28 29 30 31