hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Sorting
You can sort these results in two ways:
- By entity
- Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
- By position
- As the entities appear in the document.
You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.
hide
Most Frequent Entities
The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.
Entity | Max. Freq | Min. Freq | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
United States (United States) | 1,170 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Kentucky (Kentucky, United States) | 573 | 1 | Browse | Search |
South Carolina (South Carolina, United States) | 566 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Missouri (Missouri, United States) | 532 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Texas (Texas, United States) | 482 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Charleston (South Carolina, United States) | 470 | 8 | Browse | Search |
Washington (United States) | 449 | 3 | Browse | Search |
Abraham Lincoln | 405 | 1 | Browse | Search |
Georgia (Georgia, United States) | 340 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Maryland (Maryland, United States) | 324 | 0 | Browse | Search |
View all entities in this document... |
Browsing named entities in a specific section of Horace Greeley, The American Conflict: A History of the Great Rebellion in the United States of America, 1860-65: its Causes, Incidents, and Results: Intended to exhibit especially its moral and political phases with the drift and progress of American opinion respecting human slavery from 1776 to the close of the War for the Union. Volume I.. Search the whole document.
Found 214 total hits in 56 results.
James Otis (search for this): chapter 3
III.
Slavery in the Revolution.
the American Revolution was no sudden outbreak.
It was preceded by eleven years of peaceful remonstrance and animated discussion.
The vital question concerned the right of the British Parliament to impose taxes, at its discretion, on British subjects in any and every part of the empire.
This question presented many phases, and prompted various acts and propositions.
But its essence was always the same; and it was impossible that such men as James Otis, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and Patrick Henry, should discuss it without laying broad foundations for their argument in premises affecting the natural and general Rights of Man to self-government, with the control of his own products or earnings.
The enthusiast who imagines that our patriots were all convinced of the danger and essential iniquity of Slavery, and the conservative who argues that few or none perceived and admitted the direct application of their logic to the case of men held in
Henry Laurens (search for this): chapter 3
Benjamin Franklin (search for this): chapter 3
George Mason (search for this): chapter 3
John Adams (search for this): chapter 3
Thomas Jefferson (search for this): chapter 3
Jacob Moore (search for this): chapter 3
Gage (search for this): chapter 3
Roger Sherman (search for this): chapter 3
Samuel Hopkins (search for this): chapter 3