hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
View all matching documents...

Your search returned 468 results in 64 document sections:

question. Peter Bulkeley. John Wilson. Thomas Hooker. Whereas John Pratt of Newe Towned in danger to be assailed; the departure of Mr. Hooker would not only draw many from us, but also d Under date of May 31, 1636, Winthrop says: Mr. Hooker, pastor of the church of New Town, and the mh eminent stars, such as were Mr. Cotton and Mr. Hooker, both of the first magnitude, though of diff which Mr. Cotton had in the colony inclined Mr. Hooker and his friends to remove to some place morop. His growing popularity, and the fame of Mr. Hooker, who, as to strength of genius and his livele General Court in their granting liberty to Mr. Hooker and his company to remove to Connecticut. Tlries had some influence upon the removal of Mr. Hooker and his friends. It is known that Winthrop ater, had commenced as early as 1635; in which Hooker and Cotton espoused opposite sides, and were a is not surprising, therefore, that Cotton and Hooker should feel that their close proximity was irr[5 more...]
l General. the New Town named Cambridge. printing-press. Bond of Stephen Daye to Jose Glover. It has already been mentioned in the preceding chapter, that Mr. Hooker and a large proportion of his church removed from New Town in 1635 and 1636; and that Mr. Shepard with another company purchased their houses and lands. Among r; but resided in Watertown. Immediately after the arrival of Mr. Shepard's company, they became prominent in municipal affairs, although the larger part of Mr. Hooker's company did not remove until six months afterwards. I quote again from the Town Records:— Nov. 23, 1635. At a general meeting of the whole town, there e magistrates, and with the consent of their congregations, did agree to reduce them to two days, viz.: Mr. Cotton one Thursday, or the 5th day of the week, and Mr. Hooker at New Town the next 5th day; and Mr. Warham at Dorchester one 4th day of the week, and Mr. Welde at Roxbury, the next 4th day. This arrangement was not effect
d removal to Weathersfield, Conn. Letter from Winthrop to Hooker. Letter from Hooker to Shepard. depreciation in the valuHooker to Shepard. depreciation in the value of property. danger of general bankruptcy. reasons for removing. Sir Henry Vane. grant of Shawshine to Cambridge. remut. To such removal they were advised and encouraged by Mr. Hooker, whose eldest daughter had become the second wife of Mr. Shepard in 1637. How far Mr. Hooker may have been influenced by family considerations, or how far by that spirit of emulative evidence. Very probably Gov. Winthrop intended that Mr. Hooker should make a personal application of his general remarkJohn Winthrop, Esq., vol. II., p. 421. Two years later, Mr. Hooker wrote an earnest letter to Mr. Shepard, which was long pick, desired to provide, as appears by another letter from Hooker to Shepard, without date: Touching your business at Matabeus such, that he may shew us such mercy. Totus tuus, T. Hooker. Nov. 2th. 1640. I writ another letter, because h
eive that the honor of God and of this Court is more concerned in providing against the laying waste an ancient town and church of Christ, settled in this place for more than forty years, than any of us can be to our personal interest;—nothing that we here enjoy as to our outward accommodation being so attractive as that we should be forced here to continue, if we be disabled to maintain God's ordinances. Yet for evidence of the truth of what we thus assert we might allege the removing of Mr. Hooker and the whole church with him to Hartford, and that for this very reason, because they foresaw the narrowness of the place was such that they could not live here. Also the endeavor of Mr. Shepherd and the church with him, before his death, to remove in like manner, and that for no other reason but this, because they saw, after many years hard labor and expense of their estates that they brought with them from England, that they could not live in this place. Also we may add, that the Comm
Lucius R. Paige, History of Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1630-1877, with a genealogical register, Chapter 15: ecclesiastical History. (search)
ical History. First meeting-house. Rev. Thomas Hooker and Rev. Samuel Stone. first Church orgwhen the Braintree Company, otherwise called Mr. Hooker's company, were directed by the Court to remfor religious worship, before the arrival of Mr. Hooker's company; and for a whole year afterwards, until Mr. Hooker himself arrived, this flock probably had no pastor nor stated teacher. Meantime, Pringing of the bell. The connection between Mr. Hooker and the Braintree company is related by Mathin England, attended the ministry of the Reverend Thomas Hooker, who, to escape fines and imprisonmown, they expressed their earnest desires to Mr. Hooker, that he would come over into New England, aarrived at Boston September 4, 1633. . . . . Mr. Hooker, on his arrival at Boston, proceeded to Newttown; the second was Joanna, daughter of Rev. Thomas Hooker, and mother of Samuel (H. C. 1658), minition of his becoming successor to the famous Mr. Hooker. He preached his first sermon at Hartford, [4 more...]
k Street. Mr. Butler removed to Hartford, with Hooker, was a Deacon, and d. in 1684, leaving wife Elr Brattle Square. He removed to Hartford, with Hooker, and d. in 1648 or 1649; had sisters, West andd land in Camb. 1635. She was sister of Rev. Thomas Hooker, and was probably the widow Dorothy Chesm Copford Hall in Essex, in company with Rev. Thomas Hooker, was admitted freeman in 1634, elected a Wilson, Jr., of Medfield. The character of Mr. Hooker has deservedly been held in reverence in Newyoke Street, which was the former residence of Hooker, Shepard, and Mitchell, and afterwards of the e south side of the river, 1635. He rem. with Hooker to Hartford, where he was Constable in 1641. Sand pious men. It was successively occupied by Hooker, Shepard, Mitchell, President Leverett, and thers) 2 May 1636, and removed to Hartford, with Hooker. He was a Deacon of the Church, Juror in 1639itted freeman 1634, removed to Hartford with Mr. Hooker in 1636, and there d. 20 July 1663. Farmer.[25 more...]
tizen here, as well as in other towns where he successively resided, and was one of the first board of Selectmen, or Townsmen, elected in Camb. About the time of Hooker's emigration to Hartford, he removed to Ipswich, and thence to Andover, about 1644; of which town he was a principal founder, and Selectman from its organization the N. E. corner of Main and Dana Streets. His brother William owned 2 acres adjoining, extending eastward of Hancock Street. Mr. Butler removed to Hartford, with Hooker, was a Deacon, and d. in 1684, leaving wife Elizabeth, and children, Thomas, Samuel, Nathaniel, Joseph, Daniel, Mary Wright, Elizabeth Olmstead, and Hannah Green..) 2. William, brother to Richard (1), owned house and one acre, in 1635, on the north side of Brattle Street near Brattle Square. He removed to Hartford, with Hooker, and d. in 1648 or 1649; had sisters, West and Winter. He appears to have left neither wife nor children. (Hinman.) Butterfield, Jonathan, by w. Ruth, had Jo
ds he owned and occupied the estate at the N. W. corner of Dunster and Winthrop streets, where he resided until his death 18 Aug. 1671. He was a tailor, and for several years a Deacon of the Church, and Steward of Harvard College. In 1636 he was licensed by the General Court, to keep a house of entertainment, being apparently the first in Camb. who received such license. His wife was Isabel; but they left no posterity. Chester, Mrs., owned land in Camb. 1635. She was sister of Rev. Thomas Hooker, and was probably the widow Dorothy Chester, who settled at Weathersfield, Conn., and whose son, Leonard Chester, is said by Hinman to have been the father and ancestor of the Chester family; and to have died when young, under forty years of age, in 1648. His children at Weathersfield were John, b. 3 Aug. 1635; Dorcas, b. Nov. 1637; Stephen, b. Mar. 3 1639; Mary, b. Jan. 1641; Prudence, b. Feb. 1643; Eunice, b. Jan. 1645; Mercy, b. Feb. 1647. Hinman. Of these children, Dorcas m. Rev.
ohn Druse dyed in the warrs, and was there buried; he acquitted himself valiantly. 2. Vincent, s. of Vincent (1), had John, b. 25 Feb. 1668-9; Mehetabel, b. 26 Sept. 1670; Mary, . 7. Aug. 1672; Deliverance, b. 15 Mar. 1674-5. Vin-cent the f. d. 1683; his w.——and these four children survived. Dudley, Thomas, was one of the founders of Cambridge, and among the first who erected houses here in the spring of 161. He remained here only a few years; but removed to Ipswich about the time of Hooker's removal to Hartford, and thence to Roxbury before the close of 1636. During his whole life in New England, and even before the colonists left England, he was a member of the government. First elected an Assistant in England in 1629, he held that office eight different years, was Deputy Governor thirteen years, and Governor four years, to wit, 1634, 1640, 1645, 1650; Commissioner of the United Colonies, 1643, 1647, 1649, and President 1647, 1649. His military skill and energy seem to hav
Bev. 18 Oct. 1790, has for many years resided here, and is father of Rev. Eben Francis. 10. John, s. of Ebenezer (7), rem. to Beverly, was adjutant in the regiment of his brother, Col. Francis, at the Hubbardton Battle, afterwards Col. of militia, and d. 30 July 1822, a. nearly 69. French, William, by w. Elizabeth, had Elizabeth, b. in England about 1631, m.——Ellis of Dedham; Mary, b. about 1633, bap. in England, between two and three years old at her father's joining; John, bap. by Mr. Hooker, in Camb. about 1635 (Mitchell). Sarah, b. Mar. 1638; Jacob, b. 16 Jan. 1639-40; Hannah, b. 2 Feb. 1641-2, d. 20 June 1642; prob. another Hannah, b. about 1643, m. John Brackett at Billerica, 6 Sept. 1661; Samuel, b. 3 Dec. 1645, d. 15 July 1646. William the f. was a tailor, and Lieutenant of the militia; he res. on the westerly side of Dunster Street, about midway between Harvard Square and Mount Auburn Street, which estate he bought in 1639, and sold to William Barrett, 10 June 1656.