hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Col. J. J. Dickison, Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 11.2, Florida (ed. Clement Anselm Evans) 1 1 Browse Search
Col. O. M. Roberts, Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 11.1, Texas (ed. Clement Anselm Evans) 1 1 Browse Search
Judith White McGuire, Diary of a southern refugee during the war, by a lady of Virginia 1 1 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Your search returned 115 results in 81 document sections:

Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 36. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), chapter 1.11 (search)
inia Cavalry, March, 1862; brigadier-general, July 24, 1862; major-general, August 3, 1863. Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth and Ninth Virginia Regiments, Cavalry and Breathed's Battery of Horse Artillery, A. N. Va.; division in August, 1863, composed of cavalry brigades of W. H. F. Lee, Lomax and Wickham; subquently assigned to command of Cavalry Corps, A. N. Va., composed of divisions of W. H. F. Lee, Rosser and Munford. George Washington Custis Lee, captain Corps of Engineers, C. S. A., July 1, 1861; colonel and aide-de-camp to the President, August 31, 1861; brigadier-general, June 25, 1863; major-general, October 20, 1864. Commands—Commanding brigade of local troops for defense of Richmond; as major-general commanding troops for defense of Richmond, consisting of Barton's Brigade, the brigade of Confederate States' employees and several battalions of heavy artillery. Robert Edward Lee, major-general, commanding Virginia State forces 1861; brigadier-general, C. S. A., May 14,
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 37. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), Work of the Ordnance Bureau of the war Department of the Confederate States, 1861-5. (search)
es improving the quality of the powder. As other examples may be mentioned the casting of shells with polygonal cavities, securing the bursting into a determinate number of pieces, ingenious devices for the ignition of time fuses for the shells of rifled guns, etc. As giving some idea of the scale on which the current work of the arsenal was done, the following statement may be quoted from a paper written by Genl. Gorgas after the war. The principal issues from the Richmond arsenal from July 1st, 1861 to January 1st, 1865, including work done by the Tredegar Company and by outside contractors, were: 341Columbiads and siege guns. 1,306Field pieces (including captured guns repaired). 1,375Gun carriages. 875Caissons. 152Forges. 6,852Sets of artillery harness. 921,441Rounds of field, siege and sea-coast ammunition. 1,456,19Friction primers. 1,110,966Fuzes. 17,423Port-fires. 3,985Rockets. 323,231Infantry arms (chiefly arms from battle fields repaired). 34,067 Cavalry arms
irchild, L., X., 296, 309. Fairfax, Va.: VIII., 112; band at, VIII., 235. Fairfax Court House V.: I., 44, 348; II., 43, 53, 330; IV., 167 seq., 171, 178, 209; V., 27; IX., 265. Fairfax Road, Va., II., 43. Fairfield, Pa., II., 340. Fairplay,, C. S. S., VI., 316. Falconer, K., VIII., 149. Falconer, T. W., VIII., 151. Falconet, E. T., V., 65. Falling waters, Md., I., 348; II., 342. Falling waters, W. Va.: II., 267; the affair at, July 1, 1861, IV., 76, 78. Falls Church, Va., IV., 78, 79, 171. Falmouth, Va.: I., 362; II., 84, 106, 128; III., 36; 201; ambulance train at, VII., 314, 315; VIII., 243; foreign attaches at, IX., 185. Falmouth Station, Va., II., 85. Famous chargers, IV., 289-318. Fancy, horse of T. J. Jackson, IV., 293. Fanny,, C. S. S., I., 356. Fanny,, U. S. S., VI., 100, 310. Farenholt House, Yorktown, Va. , VIII., 317. Farmington, Miss., I., 362. Farmville,
Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 3. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.), Book III:—Pennsylvania. (search)
nd packages)430,666437,354753,569753,144 Animals126,584109,009 Forage, fuel, etc. (tons)39,35488,438 Soldiers1,264,602567,397 The cost of this transportation was—by land, $8,030,003.03; by lakes and rivers, $9,476,681.73; and by ocean, $4,798,385.02. A few words upon the most important supplies furnished to the armies will close our sketch; and in order that we may complete two official reports, both incomplete, we shall embrace in this summary the two years comprised between the 1st of July, 1861, and the 30th of June, 1863: the figures we append herewith were considered by the Secretary of War as below the real amount. During the year 1861-62 the government bought 109,799 horses and 83,720 mules: what disposition was made of them is not stated, but at the beginning of the fiscal year, July 1, 1862, we find in the depots 14,842 and 16,899 respectively of these animals. During that year the purchases amount to 174,832 horses and 86,254 mules, of which, 45,755 horses and 46,226
stimated means for the service of the current fiscal year 1861, as before stated, leaves a balance in the treasury on July 1, 1861, being the commencement of the fiscal year '62, of245,891 58 the foregoing statement assumes that the whole sum em may be deducted from the estimated expenditure of the current fiscal year, increasing the balance in the treasury on July 1, 1861, to that extent. estimates for the fiscal year from July 1, 1861, to June 30, 1862. estimated receipts July 1, 1861, to June 30, 1862. estimated receipts from customs$60,000,000 00 estimated receipts from public lands3,000,000 00 estimated receipts from miscellaneous sources1,250,000 00 estimated balance in the Treasury July 1, 1861 245,891 85 aggregate estimated means for the fiscal year 1862 $6July 1, 1861 245,891 85 aggregate estimated means for the fiscal year 1862 $64,495,891 58 estimated expenditure from permanent appropriations$9,626,386 20 estimated expenditure from balance of former appropriation not before required 12,198,112 62 estimates now submitted by the Executive departments for appropriat
rience in such a war would occasion. We have, however, had some experience, and the mistakes and indiscretions of the past should be a warning for the future. There is a decided change for the better already perceivable, and we are sure the dignified and gentlemanly appeal of the honorable Secretary of War will have the effect of inducing the press to be still more guarded in what it has to say about preparations and events: Confederate States of America, War Department, Richmond, July 1, 1861. To Newspaper Correspondents: Gentlemen:--While I have not withheld permission from any of the representatives of the press to visit the camps in Virginia, and while I am as much the uncompromising advocate of an unshackled press as I am of the freedom of speech, and of the Independence of the Confederate States, yet I have thought it proper, under existing circumstances, to make an appeal to you to forbear from the transmission and publication of such intelligence as might be d
The schooner Tropic Wind. --The following note from the British Consulate in this city will be read with interest by merchants and shippers: British Consulate, Richmond, July 1st, 1861. To the Editors of the Dispatch: For the benefit of the merchants and shippers by the British schooner Tropic Wind, lately seized by the blockading fleet in Hampton Roads, and sent as a price to Washington, I beg to state that official information has reached this office from the British Legation at Washington, which states that the Tropic Wind and her cargo have been released and given back to the charge of the master. I am, gentlemen, yours very truly, Fred. J. Cridland.
Virginia State Convention.Sixteenth day--[Second session]. Richmond, July 1, 1861. The Convention was called to order at the usual hour by Mr. Southall. Prayer was pronounced by Rev. Mr. Hall. Mr. Macfarland arose and said: The Convention will please give me its attention for a moment, while I refer to a gross misrepresentation which appears in the Dispatch of this morning, [in the report of the proceedings of the Convention as reported by the Reporter.] purporting to be a report of a conversation which occurred upon the floor on Saturday last. I say the misrepresentation is gross — gross. If it proceeded from ignorance, the ignorance is pitiable; if it proceeded from design, the malignity is contemptible. I refer to the conversation which occurred between the member from Wetzel (Mr. Hall) and myself. I have called his attention to the statement in the Dispatch, and am happy to find that he concurs entirely in the correctness of my recollection. I will read a portio
[from our Special Correspondent.] Fredericksburg, July 1, 1861. Another engagement occurred at Mathias' Point on Thursday afternoon, in which nine of the enemy were killed and many others wounded. Our troops took a large number of picks, spades and sand-bags, and left the field unscathed, as usual. From the accounts which have reached me, I judge the enemy numbered about fifty, and landed for the purpose of erecting some kind of defence. The accounts are so vague that I am unwilling to give any statement positively, except that of the number killed and the quantity of implements found in the deserted boat. Captain Ward, of the Freeborn, was killed. Our citizens were thrown into quite a furor of excitement yesterday afternoon, about 6 ½ o'clock, by the arrival at the wharf of the steamer St. Nicholas, of the Baltimore and Washington line, and at a very late hour of the night the wharf was crowded with those dubious about her identity, and curious to know the circumst
From Norfolk.[Special Correspondence of the Dispatch.] Norfolk, Va., July 1, 1861. It is evident that desertions from the Lincolnites at Old Point have recently taken place. Several small boats have floated ashore at Sewell's Point with muffied oars, which warrants the conclusion. They have been secured by our forces, and appear to be boats belonging to some large ship, probably the Cumberland. It is likely the deserters made their escape at night, and after landing some distance up the bay, set these boats adrift. Capt. Ferguson, commander of a company at the above Point, came into our city on Friday and brings us this statement. Mr. Thompson, of whom mention was made in a former letter, states that the infamous Pendergrast presents a lock of depression which bespeaks of deepest sorrow, and it is said that his own associates do not respect him, and are actually afraid to place the least confidence in him. There is great sickness, I am told, prevailing at Old P