This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
[1230b]
[1]
'undivided' means both that which cannot be
divided and that which though it can be has not been; and similarly with
'unchaste'—it denotes both that which is by nature incapable
of chastening and that which, though capable, has not actually been
chastened in respect of the errors as regards which the temperate man
acts rightly, as is the case with children; for of them it is in this
sense that the term 'unchaste'1 is used, whereas another use of it again refers to persons hard to cure or
entirely incurable by chastisement. But though 'profligacy' has more
than one sense, it is clear that the profligate are concerned with
certain pleasures and pains and that they differ from one another and
from the other vicious characters in being disposed in a certain
manner towards these; and we described previously the way in which we
apply the term 'profligacy' by analogy.2
Persons on the other hand who owing to insensitiveness are
uninfluenced by these pleasures are called by some people
'insensitive' and by others are designated by other names of the same
sort; but the state is
not a very familiar one nor of common occurrence, because all men err
more in the other direction, and susceptibility and sensitiveness to
pleasures of this sort are natural to everybody. It specially attaches
to persons like the boors who are a stock character in
comedy—
[20]
people who steer clear of pleasures even in moderate and necessary
indulgences.And since the temperate
character is shown in connection with pleasures, it follows that it is
also related to certain desires. We must, therefore, ascertain what
these are. For the temperate man is not temperate about all pleasures
nor about everything pleasant, but apparently about the objects of two
of the senses, taste and touch, and in reality about the objects of
touch. For the temperate
man is not concerned with the pleasure of beautiful things (apart from
sexual desire) or pain caused by ugly things, the medium of which is
sight, nor with the pleasure of harmonious sounds or pain of discords
conveyed through the medium of hearing, nor yet with the pleasures and
pains of smell, derived from good and bad scents; for neither is
anyone termed profligate because of being sensitive or not sensitive
to sensations of that sort— for example, a man would not be considered
profligate if when looking at a beautiful statue or horse or person,
or listening to someone singing, he did not wish for food or drink or
sexual indulgence but only wished to look at the beautiful objects or
listen to the music,—any more than the persons held
spell-bound in the abode of the Sirens. Temperance and profligacy have to do with those
two sorts of sensory objects in relation to which alone the lower
animals also happen to be sensitive and to feel pleasure and
pain—the objects of taste and of touch, whereas about virtually all
the pleasures of the other senses alike animals are clearly so
constituted as to be insensitive—
1 ἀκόλαστος(lit. 'incorrigible') often means no more than 'naughty' (Solomon).
2 This seems to refer to words which must have been lost at Aristot. Eud. Eth. 1221a 20 (Solomon).
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.