[1235b]
[1]
when it dies, as a corpse is
useless—but people that have a use for it keep it, as in
Egypt. Now all these factors1 seem to be somewhat opposed to one
another. For like is of no use to like and opposition is farthest
removed from likeness, and at the same time opposite is most useless
to opposite, since opposite is destructive of opposite. Moreover some think that to
gain a friend is easy, but others that it is the rarest thing to
recognize a friend, and not possible without misfortune, as everybody
wants to be thought a friend of the prosperous; and others maintain that we
must not trust even those who stay with us in our misfortunes, because
they are deceiving us and pretending, in order that by associating
with us when unfortunate they may gain our friendship when we are
again prosperous.Accordingly a line of argument
must be taken that will best explain to us the views held on these
matters and at the same time solve the difficulties and
contradictions. And this will be secured if the contradictory views
are shown to be held with some reason. For such a line of argument
will be most in agreement with the observed facts: and in the upshot,
if what is said is true in one sense but not true in another, both the
contradictory views stand good.There is also a question
as to whether what is dear to us is the pleasant or the
good.
[20]
If we hold dear
what we desire (and that is specially characteristic of love, for
"None is a lover that holds not dear for aye"2), and
desire is for what is pleasant, on this showing it is the pleasant
that is dear; whereas if we hold dear what we wish, it is the good;
but the pleasant and the good are different things.We must therefore attempt to decide about these matters and others
akin to them, taking as a starting point the following. The thing
desired and wished is either the good or the apparent good. Therefore
also the pleasant is desired, for it is an apparent good, since some
people think it good, and to others it appears good even though they
do not think it so (as appearance and opinion are not in the same part
of the spirit).3 Yet it is clear that both the
good and the pleasant are dear.This being decided, we
must make another assumption. Things good are some of them absolutely
good, others good for someone but not good absolutely; and the same
things are absolutely good and absolutely pleasant. For things
advantageous for a healthy body we pronounce good for the body
absolutely, but things good for a sick body not—for example
doses of medicine and surgical operations; and likewise also the things pleasant for a
healthy and perfect body are pleasant for the body absolutely, for
example to live in the light and not in the dark, although the reverse
is the case for a man with ophthalmia. And the pleasanter wine is not
the wine pleasant to a man whose palate has been corrupted by
tippling, since sometimes they pour in a dash of vinegar, but to the
uncorrupted taste.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.