This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
View text chunked by:
- bekker page : bekker line
- book : chapter : section
though they appear closely akin. Choice cannot have for its object
impossibilities: if a man were to say he chose something impossible he would be thought a
fool; but we can wish for things that are impossible, for instance immortality. 2.
[8]
Also we may wish for what cannot
be secured by our own agency, for instance, that a particular actor1 or athlete may win; but no one
chooses what does not rest with himself, but only what he thinks can be attained by his
own act. 2.
[9]
Again, we wish
rather for ends than for means, but choose the means to our end; for example we wish to be
healthy, but choose things to make us healthy; we wish to be happy, and that is the word
we use in this connection, but it would not be proper to say that we choose to be happy;
since, speaking generally, choice seems to be concerned with things within our own
control.2.
[10]
(4) Nor yet again can it be opinion. It seems that anything may be
matter of opinion—we form opinions about what is eternal,2 or impossible, just as much as about what is
within our power. Also we distinguish opinion by its truth or falsehood, not by its being
good or bad, but choice is distinguished rather as being good or bad.