There was, as it seems, a time in your history, men of
Athens, when the democracy compelled any man whom it observed to be prudent
and honest to perform public service and to hold office, not through lack of those who
wished to do so—for, while deeming the city to be fortunate in all other
respects, in this one particular I consider it has never been fortunate, that the supply
of those who wish to reap a harvest from the public business never fails it—but
the democracy used to make out of this a fine showing for itself, creditable and
profitable to the State, men of
Athens.
[
2]
For on the one hand, these men, the kind who hold
office year after year, when earnest and upright men from a different class were given
them as yokemates, used to show themselves more circumspect; and on the other hand, the
kind of men among you who are honest and upright in office, but not at all of the sort to
push their way and appeal for support, were not shut out of the posts of trust. But now,
men of
Athens, you appoint your magistrates in
exactly the same manner as you appoint your priests.
1 Then you are amazed when this one is
prosperous and that one, to your dismay, is year after year taking a rich spoil, while the
rest of you go around envying these men their blessings!
[
3]
For you are the worst people for taking away the offices that fall to your class, and
for enacting laws about them if someone serves twice as commissioner of police
2 or something of the
sort, but you allow the same men to be generals all the time.
3 There is perhaps some excuse for allowing
those engaged in the active services to continue, but to allow the others, who, though
doing nothing, have an endless tenure of office and are themselves endlessly benefited is
folly.
4 Instead, you ought to bring in some of your own number, and
there are not a few of you. For if you set up a standard, as it were, anyone who is worth
anything will thereafter come forward of his own accord.