[143]
Now since, O Titus Attius, I replied to everything which was said by you concerning the
condemnation of Oppianicus, you must inevitably confess that you were very much deceived when
you thought that I would defend the cause of Aulus Cluentius, not by arguing on his own
actions, but on the law. For you very often said that you had been informed that I intended to
defend this action, relying on the protection of the law. Is it so? Are we, then, without
knowing it, betrayed by our friends? and is there some one among those whom we think our
friends, who carries intelligence of our plans to our adversaries? Who reported this to you?
Who was so dishonest? But to whom did I tell it? No one I imagine, is in fault; but in truth
it was the law itself which suggested this to you. But do I appear to have defended it in such
a way as to have made throughout the whole case the least mention of the law? Do I appear to
have defended this cause differently from the way in which I should have defended it if
Habitus had been guilty by law, supposing the facts to be proved? Certainly, as far as a man
may assert a thing positively, I have omitted no opportunity of clearing him from the odious
imputation sought to be cast on him.
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.