[14]
Is this then the place
which of all others the soothsayers appear to intend to speak of as sacred,
which is the only one of all private buildings in the whole city which has
this argument to advance in support of its rights, that it has been adjudged
not to be sacred by those very men who preside over all sacred things?
However, refer the matter to them, as you are bound to do
according to the resolution of the senate. Either the investigation will be
allotted to you who were the first to pronounce an opinion respecting this
house, and who have pronounced it free from all religious liability; or the
senate itself will decide, which has already decided in the fullest possible
house, that one single priest alone dissenting; or else, what will certainly
be done, it will be referred back to the pontiffs, to whose authority,
integrity, and prudence our ancestors entrusted all sacred and religious
observances, whether private or public. What then can these men decide
different from what they have already decided? There are many houses in this
city, O conscript fathers; I do not know whether they are not nearly all
held by thoroughly good titles, but still they are only private titles,
titles derived from inheritance, from prescription, from purchase, or from
mortgage. But I assert that there is no other house whatever equally fenced
round by private title and incontestable rights, and at the same time by
every sort of public law of the highest authority, both human and divine.
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.