[38]
That man is being prosecuted who did not receive any money from the king, as
it has been decided that Gabinius did, but who lent a vast sum of money to
the king. Therefore, he gave it to Gabinius, as he certainly did not repay
it to Postumus. Tell me now, I beg since the man who owed Postumus money did
not pay it to him, but gave money to Gabinius, now that Gabinius is
condemned, has he paid him back that money, or does he owe it to him still?
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.