[27] Forb. would make ‘domus’ nom. in apposition to ‘labor,’ like 7. 248, “Iliadumque labor vestes:” but it is doubtless gen., probably to be explained as definitive (Madv. § 286), like ‘opus Academicorum,’ ‘familia Scipionum.’ The labour is that of Daedalus, not, as Heyne thought, that of the wanderers in the labyrinth. Perhaps also ‘domus’ is to be constructed with ‘error’ as in Catull. 62 (64). 115, which Virg. had in his mind, “Tecti frustraretur inobservabilis error,” though the construction would not be quite the same as that with ‘labor.’ “Falleret indeprensus et inremeabilis error” 5. 591.
This text is part of:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.