οὐ κάτοιδα, πλὴν “κ.τ.λ.”: cp. 410 n. πέμπει με κείνη. Ellendt agrees with Brunck in writing “μ᾽ ἐκείνη”, on the ground that the demonstrative pron. gains emphasis by the elision. But there is really nothing to choose. The fact that the best MS. (L) has the rarer form may be allowed to turn the scale. (Cp. Tr. 1091.)
This text is part of:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.