previous next

[104] χρυσείοισι λίνοισιν ἐερμένον: Barnes' “χρύσεον, ἠλέκτροισιν ἐερμένον”, which recent editors have accepted, is graphically quite unjustified; nor is there reason to suppose that the author slavishly imitated Homer (Od. 18.296). See J. H. S. xvii. p. 244. The manuscript tradition has been vindicated by a close parallel from a Delian inventory of 364 B.C. Cf. B. C. H. x. p. 464 “ορμος χρυσους συν τωι λινωι και τοις επηρτημενοις”, C.I.A. ii. pt. ii. p. 18. v. 71, p. 128 vv. 1, 19. In Od. 15.460 χρύσεον ὅρμον ἔχων μετὰ δ᾽ ἠλέκτροισιν ἔερτο” the chain was strung at intervals with amber beads or pendants; so here the necklace appears to have been ornamented with gold wire used like thread, or with actual thread gilded (“χρύσειοι”). The latter explanation seems supported by B. C. H. vi. p. 50 “ορμος χρυσους επι ταινιδιωι” and p. 32 “ταινια περιηργυρωμενη”. The poet's description of the necklace may well have been based upon votive offerings which he saw at Delos. On these Delian “ὅρμοι” see Homolle B. C. H. vi. p. 123, 124.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: