previous next

[213] ἐκφθέγξατο, though preserved in only one family of MSS., is obviously right. For the constr. compare 23.477κεφαλῆς ἐκδέρκεται ὄσσε”. No adequate parallel can be adduced for “ἐφθέγξατο δίνης” in the sense spoke from the eddy; none of those given in H. G. § 152, is quite like this. Hence most edd. have followed Isaac Casaubon in reading the compound. Ar. seems to have omitted δ᾽ and presumably put a colon at the end of 212, thus producing a harsh asyndeton, and unduly separating “προσέφη” from the speech which it introduces. Heyne suspects the line, not without reason, ‘quod otiosus est, et quod in fine ingrata repetitio est: “βαθυδίνης” et “δίνης”.’

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide References (1 total)
  • Commentary references from this page (1):
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: