previous next

[539] It is not easy to decide between ἀλάλκοι and “ἀμύναι”. As a rule “ἀμύνειν” takes acc. and gen., “ἀλαλκεῖν” acc. and dat. On the other hand, “λοιγὸν ἀλαλκεῖν” comes twice besides in this book (138, 250), and we have “φάρμακον κέν τοι κρατὸς ἀλάλκηισιν κακὸν ἦμαρ,Od. 10.288 , and “οὐκ ἔσθ᾽ ὃς σῆς γε κύνας κεφαλῆς ἀπαλάλκοι22.348. The balance is thus slightly in favour of the text. There are two possible alternatives, if we accept it, which evade the unusual constr.; we may take “Τρώων” with “ἀντίος”, putting the comma after it, or we may make it depend as a possessive gen. upon “λοιγόν”, cf. “λοιγὸν Ἀχαιῶν”, 134. But neither of these is natural; and “ἀντίος” is generally used of hostile meeting.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide References (2 total)
  • Commentary references from this page (2):
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: