previous next

[711] ἀλλ́ηλων seems to be governed by “λαβέτην”, as though “λαβέσθην”. If it be taken with “ἀγκάς” there is no object left for “λαβέτην”. For ἀγκάς Fick would read “ἄγκασε”, like “κύκλοσε”, cf. “ἄγκαθεν”, Aisch. Eum. 80.But for the short -“ας” in 14.346 we should be justified in regarding the word as an acc. plur. (so Hesych.) and making it the object of “λαβέτην”, exactly our caught hold of one another. As it is perhaps we should read “ἀλλήλους” with

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide References (2 total)
  • Commentary references from this page (2):
    • Aeschylus, Eumenides, 80
    • Homer, Iliad, 14.346
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: