καὶ ἐν Λακεδαίμονι. I follow
Winckelmann and others (see crit. n.) in bracketing these
words: possibly they should be transposed to a place in the next clause, either after
γὰρ or after Βοιωτοῖς (in suggesting this I find myself anticipated by an anonymous
critic, ap. Teuffel, Rhein. Mus. XXIX. p. 145).
That Laconia was a hot-bed of paederasty might be inferred à priori from its military-oligarchical constitution, and is
betokened by the verb λακωνίζειν used as a synonym
for παιδικοῖς χρῆσθαι (Ar. frag. 322), and the adj. κυσολάκων for παιδεραστής. It is certainly unlikely that a ποικίλος νόμος would be ascribed to the Laconians, and
unlikely too that they would be classed apart from the μὴ
σοφοὶ λέγειν. Moreover, in 182 D ff. it
is ὁ ἐνθάδε (ἡμέτερος) νόμος which is treated as
ποικίλος, and no mention is made there of a similar
Laconian νόμος. For Laconian mores, Stallb. cites Xen. Rep. Lac. II. 13; Plut. Lac.
Inst. p. 237 B; Aelian V. H.
III. 10. 12. In Xen. Symp. VIII. 35 the Lacedaemonians are
lauded—θεὰν γὰρ οὐ τὴν Ἀναίδειαν ἀλλὰ τὴν
Αἰδῶ νομίζουσι (which ought, perhaps, to be construed as implying that
they are slighted here).
This text is part of:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.