[264]
magnanimity you have appreciated in peace.
Mr. Greeley, in his History of the Rebellion, says emphatically, these were “the very darkest hours of our contest — those in which our loyal people most profoundly despaired of its successful issue.”
1 Swinton, a shrewd observer and candid historian, says: “So gloomy was the military outlook after the action on the Chickahominy, and to such a degree by consequence had the moral spring of the public mind become relaxed, that there was at this time great danger of a collapse of the war.”
And he adds, significantly: “The archives of the State Department, when one day made public, will show how deeply the Government was affected by the want of military success, and to what resolutions the Executive had in consequence come.”
2 But, alas!
the “success elsewhere,” of which the historian speaks, had “come to brighten the horizon,” and, continuing, quickened into vigorous action the vast resources of the North.
Grant, reinforced by over thirty thousand men at Spotsylvania,3 was heavily reinforced again; and putting aside with great firmness the well known wishes of the Federal Executive, prepared to change his strategy for the fifth time, and
This text is part of:
1 He embraces period from Cold Harbor to Crater, inclusive.
3 As the Secretary of War denies access to the archives at Washington, it is impossible to state the precise figures. Mr. Stanton in his report says: “Meanwhile, in order to repair the losses of the Army of the Potomac, the chief part of the force designed to guard the Middle Department (Baltimore) and the Department of Washington (in all 47,751 men), was called forward to the front.”
Richmond, VA. 1876.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.