previous next
[128] son listened in the lower house of the Massachusetts Legislature to the reading and almost unanimous 1 adoption of a report emphatically upholding the right of petition (which had been virtually denied), especially ‘for the removal of a great social, moral and political evil’; denouncing the assumption of power in the obnoxious resolution as doing violence to the Constitution and to the inherent, absolute and inalienable rights of man; cordially approving the conduct of the State's representatives, and reaffirming the authority of Congress to abolish slavery in the District. The Massachusetts Senate followed with even stronger resolutions.2
‘We have had,’ writes Mr. Garrison to George W. Benson,3 ‘and are yet having, lively times in our Legislature on the subject of slavery. You will see, by the last Liberator, how the question has been carried—in one branch by a vote of 378 to 16,4 in the other by a vote of 33 to none!5 in our favor, too! It is the most extraordinary change in political action, on a moral subject, in the annals of legislation. However, a strong effort is now making, by our enemies, to suppress all the resolutions upon the final vote for concurrence. It is not probable that they will succeed, but our majority will be reduced. No6 matter: the old Commonwealth of Massachusetts will do her duty in grand style, and pioneer the way for her sister States in the cause of emancipation. We shall secure this session, undoubtedly, the right of trial by jury to runaway slaves.’7

After the middle of June, Mr. Garrison, for the better health of his family, removed again to Brooklyn, leaving his friend Oliver Johnson as sub-editor in charge of the8 Liberator, but aiming to write regularly for the paper. Since the annual meeting of the Massachusetts Anti-Slavery Society he had attended four others, to each of which a word must be given. One was the quarterly

1 Lib. 7.51.

2 Lib. 7.55, 59.

3 Ms. April 3, 1837.

4 Including, among the nays, James L. Homer, of the Commercial Gazette.

5 This vote was on a substitute for the final House resolution, and pressed Congress to the ‘early exercise’ of its power over the District (Lib. 7.55).

6 Lib. 7.59.

7 This significant measure passed both houses almost without dissent (Lib. 7.65-67). A similar law was enacted in New Jersey shortly afterward (Lib. 7.94), but was rejected in Pennsylvania (Lib. 7.11, 47).

8 Lib. 7.99; Ms. June 14, 1837.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Places (automatically extracted)
hide People (automatically extracted)
Sort people alphabetically, as they appear on the page, by frequency
Click on a person to search for him/her in this document.
Lib (8)
William Lloyd Garrison (2)
Oliver Johnson (1)
House (1)
James L. Homer (1)
George W. Benson (1)
hide Dates (automatically extracted)
Sort dates alphabetically, as they appear on the page, by frequency
Click on a date to search for it in this document.
June 14th, 1837 AD (1)
April 3rd, 1837 AD (1)
June (1)
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: