previous next
[220] people for the next ten years did not exhibit them as the most hopeful subjects of the first experiment. It proved to be a bad precedent, which, adopted by his successor, brought on a memorable conflict with Congress.

In view of the proceedings in Louisiana and Arkansas, and to prevent such exceptional and inconsiderate action as the House took in the admission of Hahn and Flanders from Louisiana, Sumner introduced a resolution, May 27, 1864, declaring that States pretending to secede, and still battling against the national government, must be regarded as rebel States, not to be readmitted to representation until after a vote of both houses,1—a precaution against hasty and exceptional action by one body without the other's concurrence, which Congress two years later found it wise to adopt.2 A few days later the question came up directly on a resolution introduced by Lane of Kansas, to recognize the State government of Arkansas initiated under the President's direction, when Sumner addressed the Senate. He set forth as objections, that the proposed government was organized irregularly under a military order, and by only a small minority of the people, and within a territory still under military occupation, subject to hostile raids, and excluded by law from ordinary commercial intercourse; but the stress of his argument was on his chief proposition, that Congress alone—that is, the two houses (the President in this, as in other legislation, holding the veto power)—could readmit the revolted States.3 The speech was a strong statement, briefer than most of his speeches on important topics, and it avoided any direct issue with the President. It was an appeal for caution and prudence in a first step of vast consequence, and for waiting on events. Both resolutions—Sumner's and Lane's—went to the judiciary committee, and were reported adversely by Trumbull its chairman; and the credentials of the persons claiming to be senators from the State met the same fate. This was equivalent to a decision

1 Works, vol. VIII. p. 470. He reaffirmed the same doctrine in resolutions, Feb. 23, 1865 (Works, vol. IX. p. 311); and again March 8, 1865 (Works, vol. IX. p. 340). Resolutions of a similar character were proposed by Garfield and Dawes in the House, June 13 and 22. 1864.

2 The resolution passed the House Feb. 20, 1866, and the Senate March 2.

3 June 13, 1864; Works, vol. IX. pp. 1-25. At the next session, Feb. 17, 1865, Sumner contended against the recognition of a State government set up in Virginia, on the ground that the Legislature was ‘little more than the Common Council of Alexandria,’ and that the greater part of the State was as yet in the possession of an armed rebellion. Works, vol. IX. pp. 266-268.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Places (automatically extracted)

View a map of the most frequently mentioned places in this document.

Sort places alphabetically, as they appear on the page, by frequency
Click on a place to search for it in this document.
Louisiana (Louisiana, United States) (2)
Arkansas (Arkansas, United States) (2)
Kansas (Kansas, United States) (1)

Download Pleiades ancient places geospacial dataset for this text.

hide People (automatically extracted)
Sort people alphabetically, as they appear on the page, by frequency
Click on a person to search for him/her in this document.
Charles Sumner (3)
Lane (2)
Lyman Trumbull (1)
Hahn (1)
James A. Garfield (1)
Flanders (1)
Henry L. Dawes (1)
hide Dates (automatically extracted)
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: