[
261]
Indies, imposed upon them the most perfect neu-
trality.
But neutrality to be respected needs to be strong.
As
England did not disguise her aggressive intentions, the city of
Amsterdam and
van Berckel sought to strengthen the
Dutch navy, but were thwarted by Prince Louis,
Fagel, and the stadholder.
The English party favored an increase of the army; and, to the great discontent of the stadholder, they were defeated by the deputies of
Amsterdam,
Haarlem, Dort, and
Delft.
The
Dutch were still brave, provident, and capable of acts of magnanimity; but they were betrayed by their selfish executive and the consequent want of unity of action.
In April, 1778, the
American commissioners at
Paris,—Franklin,
Arthur Lee, and
John Adams,—in a letter to the grand pensionary,
van Bleiswijck, proposed a good understanding and commerce between the two nations, and promised to communicate to the states-general their commercial treaty with
France.
The
Dutch government through all its organs met this only overture of the
Americans by silence and total neglect.
It was neither put in deliberation nor answered.
The British secretary of state could find no ground for complaint whatever.
1
Still the merchants of
Amsterdam saw in the independence of the
United States a virtual repeal of the
British navigation acts; and the most pleasing historical recollections of the
Dutch people were revived by the rise of the new republic.
In July, the king of
France published a declaration protecting neutral ships, though bound to or from hostile ports, and though carrying contraband goods,