previous next


The Confederate privateers — another iron-clad at Sea.

The English papers by the Etna, at New York, devote much space to remarks concerning Confederate privateers. The London Star, after speaking of the depredations of the Alabama, remarks:

It is known that as many as nine other ships are being built or equipped in British harbors for the service of the Confederates. If they were to serve simply and strictly as vessels of war — If they were to be employed in an attempt to break the blockade, to recover New Orleans, to fight the Federal in the Southern rivers. an other legitimate acts of warfare — they would, nevertheless, be subject to arrest and detention. They would come clearly within the prohibition acts tending to aid and assist either belligerent.

A letter from New York, dated Wednesday, says:

‘ The mercantile letters from Landon, Liverpool. and Havre, received by the Etna, are devoted largely to the case of the Confederate steamer Alabama. Ship agents write to their correspondents here that it is next to impossible to procure freight for American bottoms and that until the Alabama is swept from the seas our vessels might as well stay on this side. nobody there being disposed to charter them, except at a ruinous premium. This is bad enough, but there is something worse to come. News had been received in Liverpool, on the 3d, that another pirate had made her appearance. The Danish ship Jupitef, Captain Rickners, from New York for Antworp at Plymouth, reported 14th October, in lat 41 N, lon 58.30 west of Greenwich, found herself in company of a steamer under sail; shortly afterwards shot and raised the rebel flag. Thereupon the Jupiter have to, and the Jupiter passed round her stern. The Jupiter raised the Danish colors, on perceiving which a voice called from the steamer, ‘"You can go!"’--The steamer then went across the bow of the J. and have to, waiting for another vessel astern. The rebel is described as an iron screw steamer, carrying six guns, English built, and about 700 or 800 tons bur hen.

This bit of intelligence has created a great breeze on 'change, and the talk is that the Navy Department ought to send more men-of-war to scour the Atlantic than have already been sent. The under writers, of course, are doing their best to put the worst face on the matter, hoping thereby to pocket several additional per cent on the war risk, while the English and other foreign merchants interested in shipping, as you may be certain, are not inclined to say or do anything calculated to allay the alarm.

’ A Washington dispatch to the Philadelphia Press says:

Gen. Cameron, American Minister to Russia, says that the dispatch from Washington to a Philadelphia paper, making light of his statement in regard to the iron clads now in course of construction at Liverpool and Glasgow was a mistake, and while he denies having ever said that ‘"twenty"’ iron-clads were being built in Scotland and England, he repeats what he stated in New York on his arrival, that ‘"three"’ of the largest class iron steamers are now being constructed, one at Glasgow and two at Liverpool, notoriously for the rebel service, and also that Mr. Dudley, American Consul at Liverpool, has laid this information before the Government.

’ The London Globe takes the alarm at the destruction of property by the Alabama, and says:

‘ The work of the Confederate war vessel ‘"No. 290,"’ Captain Semmes, has now fixed the attention of every merchant in Europe, and all are coming, or have come, to the conclusion that ‘"something must be done."’ The vessels destroyed and threatened are those sailing under the Federal flag. But vessels so sailing have hitherto carried more property of British owners than of any others. And as Captain Semmes burns vessels and cargoes without distinction, and the cargo is commonly much mere valuable than the vessel, we, as a neutral nation, have hitherto been probably the chief sufferers.

’ * * * *

As some pressure is now brought to bear upon our own Government by the losers of British property destroyed by Captain Semmes, it is not improbable that the views of Ministers touching this new complication of affairs will soon find authoritative expression.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Places (automatically extracted)

View a map of the most frequently mentioned places in this document.

Sort places alphabetically, as they appear on the page, by frequency
Click on a place to search for it in this document.
Glasgow (United Kingdom) (2)
Scotland (United Kingdom) (1)
Russia (Russia) (1)
Plymouth, N. C. (North Carolina, United States) (1)
Greenwich (Virginia, United States) (1)
Denmark (Denmark) (1)
hide People (automatically extracted)
Sort people alphabetically, as they appear on the page, by frequency
Click on a person to search for him/her in this document.
Semmes (3)
Washington (1)
Rickners (1)
Landon (1)
Dudley (1)
Cameron (1)
hide Dates (automatically extracted)
Sort dates alphabetically, as they appear on the page, by frequency
Click on a date to search for it in this document.
October 14th (1)
3rd (1)
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: