[71]
of fact. “You have no right to bring an action against
me, as it is impossible for you to have been appointed
to represent the actual plaintiff.” It then has to be
decided whether he could have been so appointed.
“You ought not to have proceeded by interdict,1 but
to have put in a plea for possession.” The point
in doubt is whether the interdict is legal. All these
points fall under the head of legal questions.
1 sc. by getting an order for restitution.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.