[p. vii]


Life of Quintilian

Marcus Fabius Quintilianus was, like Seneca, of Spanish origin, being born about 35 A.D. at Calagurris. His father was a rhetorician of some note who practised with success at Rome. It is not surprising therefore to find that the young Quintilian was sent to Rome for his education. Among his teachers were the famous grammaticus Remmius Palaemon, and the no less distinguished rhetorician Domitius Afer. On completing his education he seems to have returned to his native land to teach rhetoric there, for we next hear of him as being brought to Rome in 68 A.D. by Galba, then governor of Hispania Tarraconensis. At Rome he met with great success as a teacher and was the first rhetorician to set up a genuine public school and to receive a salary from the State. He continued to teach for twenty years and had among his pupils the younger Pliny and the two sons of Domitilla, the sister of Domitian. He was also a successful pleader in the courts as we gather from more than one passage in his works. Late in life he married and had two sons. But both wife and children predeceased him. [p. viii] He died full of honour, the possessor of wide lands and consular rank. The date of his death is unknown, but it was before 100 A.D. He left behind him a treatise “On the causes of the decadence of Roman oratory” (De causis corruptae eloquentiae), the present work, and a speech in defence of a certain Naevius Arpinianus, who was accused of murdering his wife. These are the only works known to have been actually published by him, though others of his speeches had been taken down in shorthand and circulated against his will, while an excess of zeal on the part of his pupils resulted in the unauthorised publication of two series of lecture notes. The present work alone survives. The declamations which have come down to us under his name are spurious. Of his character the Institutio Oratoria gives us the pleasantest impression. Humane, kindly and of a deeply affectionate nature, gifted with a robust common sense and sound literary judgment, he may well have been the ideal school-master. The fulsome references to Domitian are the only blemishes which mar this otherwise pleasing impression. And even here we must remember his great debt to the Flavian house and the genuine difficulty for a man in his position of avoiding the official style in speaking of the emperor.

As a stylist, though he is often difficult owing to compression and the epigrammatic turn which he gives his phrases, he is never affected or extravagant. He is still under the influence of the sound traditions [p. ix] of the Ciceronian age, and his Latin is silver-gilt rather than silver. His Institutio Oratoria, despite the fact that much of it is highly technical, has still much that is of interest to-day, even for those who care little for the history of rhetoric. Notably in the first book his precepts as regards education have lasting value: they may not be strikingly original, but they are sound, humane and admirably put. In the more technical portions of his work he is unequal; the reader feels that he cares but little about the minute pedantries of rhetorical technique, and that he lacks method in his presentation of the varying views held by his predecessors. But once he is free of such minor details and touches on themes of real practical interest, he is a changed man. He is at times really eloquent, and always vigorous and sound, while throughout the whole work he keeps the same high ideal unswervingly before him.

[p. x] [p. xi]



Ed. princeps, Campano, Rome, 1470.

Gronov, Leyden, 1665.

Gibson, Oxford, 1693.

Obrecht, Strassburg, 1698.

Burmann, Leyden, 1720.

Capperonnier, Paris, 1725.

Gesner, Göttingen, 1738.

Spalding, Leipzig, 1798–1816, with supplementary volume of notes by Zumpt, 1829, and another by Bonnell, 1834.


Zumpt, Leipzig, 1831.

Bonnell. Tenbner texts, 1854.

Halm, Leipzig, 1868.

Meister, Leipzig, 1886–7.

Radermacher, Teubner texts, 1907 (Bks. 1–6). Second edition by V. Buchheit, 2 vols., 1959.

D. M. Gaunt, M. Fabii Quintiliani Institutio Oratoria. Selections with commentary and summaries of the intervening material. London, W. Heinemann. 1952.

editions of single books

Bk. 1, Fierville, Paris, 1890; F. Colson. Cambridge, 1924.

Bk. 10, Peterson, Oxford, 1891.

Bk. 10 and 12, Frieze, New York; Bk. 12, R. G. Austin, Oxford, 1948.

Of the above the commentary of Spalding and the texts of Halm, Meister and Radermacher are by far the most important. Peterson's edition of Bk. 10 contains an admirable introduction dealing with the life of Quintilian, his gifts as a critic, his style and language and the MSS. [p. xii]

In connection with the history of rhetorical theory and practice at Rome, the following works are of special importance:—

Cicero, de Oratore (Ed. Wilkins, Oxford, 1892).

Cicero, Orator (Ed. Sandys, Cambridge, 1889).

Cicero, Brutus (Ed. Kellogg, Boston, 1889).

Tacitus, Dialogus de claris oratoribus (Ed. Peterson, Oxford, 1893).

For the history of Latin rhetoric and education the following works may be consulted:—

Norden, Die Antike Kunstprosa, Leipzig, 1898.

Volkmann, Die Rhetorik der Griechen und Römer, Leipzig, 1885.

Marquardt, Das Privatleben der Römer, pp. 80–126, ed. 2, Leipzig, 1886.

Wilkins, Roman Education, Cambridge, 1905.

English translations of Quintilian

Guthrie, London, 1805.

Watson, in Bohn's series, reprinted 1903.

The Manuscripts

The MSS. of the Institutio Oratoria fall into three groups:—

(1) The Codex Ambrosianus (E153), an eleventh-century MS. now at Milan. Chs. ix. iv. 135 to xii. xi. 22 are missing.

(2) The Codex Bernensis (351) of the 10th century.

The Codex Bambergensis (M. 4, 14) of the 10th century.

The Codex Nostradamensis (Paris, Lat. 18527) of the 10th (?) century.

This group has the following lucunae: i. to i. 7; v. xiv. 12 to viii. iii. 64; viii. vi. 17 to 67; IX. iii. 2 to x. i. 107; xi. i. 71 to ii. 23; XII. x. 43 to end. The gaps are to be supplied from the Codex Bambergensis, in which they have been filled in by a later hand from a MS. resembling the Ambrosianus.

(3) A number of late MSS of the 15th century of the usual type. [p. xiii]

Occasional assistance may he obtained from the Ars Rhetorica of Julius Victor (Halm, Rhet. Lat. minores, II. pp. 373 8qq.), which is based on Quintilian and often transcribes whole passages: the Rhetorical treatise attributed to Cassiodorus (Haln, op. cit. p. 501) is also sometimes useful.

The text in this volume is that of Halm, with a few slight alterations in reading, and a considerable number in punctuation. The first family is indicated by A in critical notes, the second by B. Where particular MSS. are mentioned they are indicated by their name.


[p. xiv] A = Codex Ambrosianus I, 11th century.

B = Agreement of Codex Bernensis, Bambergensis and Nostradamensis, 10th century.

G = Codex Bambergensis in those passages where gaps have been supplied by a later 11th-century hand.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: