[70]
In some
cases, too, we may mitigate a bad impression by
words which avoid the appearance of a statement of
facts. We may say, for instance, “He did not, as
our opponent asserts, enter the temple with the
deliberate intention of theft nor seek a favourable
occasion for the purpose, but was led astray by
the opportunity, the absence of custodians, and
the sight of the money (and money has always an
undue influence on the mind of man), and so
yielded to temptation. What does that matter?
He committed the offence and is a thief. It is
[p. 89]
useless to defend an act to the punishment of
which we can raise no objection.”
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.