[1315a]
[1]
if they think that their ruler has religious scruples and pays
regard to the gods, and also they plot against him less, thinking that he has
even the gods as allies), though he should not display a foolish
religiosity. And he must pay such
honor to those who display merit in any matter that they may think that they
could never be more honored by the citizens if they were in dependent; and
honors of this kind he should bestow in person, but inflict his punishments by
the agency of other magistrates and law-courts. And it is a protection common to
every sort of monarchy to make no one man great, but if necessary to exalt
several (for they will keep watch on one another), and if
after all the ruler has to elevate an individual, at all events not take a man
of bold spirit (for such a character is most enterprising in all
undertakings); and if he thinks fit to remove somebody from his power,
to do this by gradual stages and not take away the whole of his authority at
once. And again he should carefully
avoid all forms of outrage, and two beyond all, violent bodily punishments and
outrage of the young. And this caution must especially be exercised in relation
to the ambitious, for while to be slighted in regard to property annoys the
lovers of wealth, slights that involve dishonor are what men of honorable
ambition and high character resent.
[20]
Hence the tyrant should either not consort with men of this kind, or appear to
inflict his punishments paternally and not because of contempt, and to indulge
in the society of the young for reasons of passion, not because he has the
power, and in general he should buy off what are thought to be dishonors by
greater honors. And among those who
make attempts upon the life of a ruler the most formidable and those against
whom the greatest precaution is needed are those that are ready to sacrifice
their lives if they can destroy him. Hence the greatest care must be taken to
guard against those who think that insolent outrage is being done either to
themselves or to those who happen to be under their care; for men attacking
under the influence of anger are reckless of themselves, as Heraclitus1 also observed when he said that anger
was hard to combat because it would buy revenge with a life. And since states consist of two parts, the poor
people and the rich, the most important thing is for both to think that they owe
their safety to the government and for it to prevent either from being wronged
by the other, but whichever class is the stronger, this must be made to be
entirely on the side of the government, as, if this support for the tyrant's
interests is secured, there is no need for him to institute a liberation of
slaves or a disarming of the citizens, for one of the two parts of the state
added to his power will be enough to make him and them stronger than their
attackers. But to discuss each of
such matters separately is superfluous; for the thing to aim at is clear,
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.