The ram Manassas at the passage of the New Orleans forts.
A. F. Warley, Captain, C. S. N.
Entrance to Fort St. Philip. From a photograph taken in 1884. |
Entrance to Fort St. Philip. From a photograph taken in 1884. |
1 Professor J. Russell Soley, U. S. N., in a communication to the Editors, gives the following discussion of the question, Did the Manassas ram the Hartford at the battle of New Orleans? “In the affirmative is the following testimony: (1) ‘Captain Kautz, a lieutenant on board the Hartford, says that immediately after the Hartford went ashore she was struck by the fire-raft which was pushed up by the tug Mosher, and immediately after that event the Manassas struck her and turned her round so that she slid off the shoal. (2) Lieutenant Warley, commanding the Manassas, states that she struck the Hartford. He does not state that she struck the Brooklyn.’ In the negative is the following testimony: (1) Admiral Farragut makes no mention of being struck by a ram. His report says: ‘ I discovered a fire-raft coming down upon us, and in attempting to avoid it ran the ship on shore, and the ram Manassas, which I had not seen, lay on the opposite side of it and pushed it down upon us.’ Farragut evidently mistook the Mosher for the Manassas, as it is a well-established fact that the Mosher shoved the raft against the Hartford. (2) Commander Richard Wainwright, commanding the Hartford, makes no mention in his detailed report of having been struck by any ram. He describes the incident of the fire-raft thus: ‘ At 4:15 grounded on shoal near Fort St. Philip, in the endeavor to clear a fire-raft which was propelled by a ram on our port quarter, setting fire to the ship.’ Wainwright also makes the mistake of calling the Mosher a ram, but this only bears out the general opinion among the Union officers as to the character of all the Confederate vessels. (3) The report of James H. Conley, carpenter of the Hartford, stating in detail the damages sustained by the ship in the action, makes no mention of any injury which could have been inflicted by a ram. (4) It seems impossible that the Manassas should have struck such a blow to the Hartford as Warley describes and have left no traceable injury. (5) It is exceedingly improbable that the Manassas would have struck the Hartford under such advantageous circumstances as Captain Kautz describes (when the Hartford was ashore) and have had no effect other than to turn the Hartford round so that she slid off the shoal. (6) Commander Watson informs me that he thinks it is a mistake to suppose that the Manassas touched the Hartford at any time. He goes on to say: ‘Farragut thought it was the Manassas which pushed the fire-raft against the Hartford's port side, while the Confederate reports state that this was done by a certain tug-boat. The admiral never, to my knowledge, entertained the idea that such a blow’ as the Manassas is supposed to have given ‘ would have released the Hartford's bow. I believe that he ascribed her release to the backing of the screw as I did; I always understood him that way.’ (7) Mr. Herbert B. Tyson says, in a recent letter (Mr. Tyson was a midshipman and the navigator of the Hartford at this time, but has since left the service): ‘I am satisfied the Hartford was never rammed at the battle of New Orleans. The nearest approach to her being rammed was when a Confederate craft pushed a fire-raft under her port quarter while she was aground under Fort St. Philip.’ (8 ) Lieutenant Warley mentions only one vessel rammed by him in this way, and his description certainly answers for what happened in the attack on the Brooklyn. (9) In reference to the Brooklyn there is no possible question. Captain Craven's and Commander Bartlett's testimony is absolutely conclusive. (10) Lieutenant Warley must be mistaken in stating that Captain Mahan informed him that his vessel struck the Hartford. Mahan in his book [pp. 76 and 77] does not mention any ramming of the Hartford by the Manassas. His statements are such that if he had supposed the Manassas rammed the Hartford he could not have omitted it. He says of the Hartford: ‘She took the ground close under St. Philip, the raft lying on her port quarter, against which it was pushed by the tug Mosher,’ adding in a foot-note, ‘ As this feat has been usually ascribed to the Manassas, it may be well to say that the statement in the text rests on the testimony of the commander of the ram, as well as other evidence.’ He closes his description of this episode by saying:. ‘Then working herself clear, the Hartford passed from under their fire.’ Finally he gives a minute description of the ramming of the Brooklyn by the Manassas.”
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.