Napoleon and his Generals.
In the "Life of
Sir William Napier" we find the following notes of a remarkable conversation which the gallant officer had with
Marshal Soult relative to
Napoleon and his generals:
"
Grouchy," he said, "was not a traitor; he was unequal to his situation-- that is to say, he could not command more than a few thousand men. I calculated (said
Soult) the value of French generals by the number of men they were capable of commanding.
I name nobody, but there were amongst them men who were worth ten thousand men; who were worth fifteen-thousand, twenty thousand, or even, in case of necessity, sixty thousand.
The art of commanding armies becomes more difficult as the numbers increase.
It is very different to command eighty thousand and to command a hundred thousand.
Pass a hundred thousand, and the human mind is scarcely equal to the task.
Napoleon committed a great error in giving so many men to
Grouchy.
1st.
That General was not equal to the command.
2d. Ten thousand men would have been sufficient to impose on the Prussians.
But the
Emperor seemed at times to be changed; there were moments when his genius and activity seemed as powerful and as fresh as ever; at other moments he seemed apathetic.
For example, he fought the
battle of Waterloo without having himself examined the enemy's position.
He trusted to
General Haxo's report.
In former days, he would have examined and re-examined it is person.
Ney was the evil genius of the campaign; he neglected his orders at Quatre Bras, and again at
Waterloo; he attacked
Wellington's position beyond Haye
Saint contrary to orders and too soon; but he is dead; he was unfortunate.
I do not like to speak of his errors.
Hoche.--
Soult knew him well. "I was with him," he said, ‘"when he died; he was poisoned by the Directory; I thought so at the time; I think so still."’
Napoleon--"
Marshal ! Was not
Napoleon the greatest genius of all the men
France produced ?" "Ah ! bah ! yes ! there was no comparison." "Was he not a good and kind man also ?" Here
Soult raised his head with great eagerness, and exclaimed in an emphatic manner, "
Napoleon n'a jamais perdu personne de son propre mouvement — jamais, jamais, jamais ! It was necessary, when once you were known to him, to commit faults, nay even crimes, over and over again, twenty, thirty times, before he could bring himself even to punish !"
Joseph.--"At the battle of Ocans, Joseph was at my side, and so meek, so quiet, I could have put him in my pocket.
After the battle was gained, and we had supped, instead of conversing upon the action and the war, he entered into a vehement allocution against the
Emperor, and told me that he had written to him a letter which he would show me. It was menacing, urgent, insolent; and his discourse went to sounding me upon exciting the army to resist
Napoleon.
I rose from my chair and addressed him thus: "Sire, you speak and act in such a manner that you give me the right to treat you without reserve or ceremony; and, first, it is fortunate for you that.
I choose to speak to you as a private person and not as a marshal of
France.--What ! you imagine that the of such a victory as Ocana renders you so
dear to the
French soldiers that they will support your absurd and rash notions ? Suppose it were true; have you gained the affections also of the rest of the
French army in
Spain?
Are you sure of those who remain to
France out of
Spain?
You are woefully deceived; beware of how you try what you are thinking of, even with the army here under your orders; it will be dangerous.
And then you menace your brother!
You! you menace
Napoleon!
Oh, Sire!
you shock me." (Here
Soult put himself into the attitude, and used the same gestures as he had done to Joseph, and they were very striking; he covered his eye with one of his hands, and with the other seemed to repulse some horrid image, and his color and looks were very animated.) "Who are you?
what are you?
who has made you?
Your brother; and you menace him!
Burn your letter, Sire, and think again." "What!" exclaimed the king, "am I not his eider brother, the chief of his family?" "Yes, Sire, but you speak not as a brother; you speak and would act as a king; and you are not the chief of monarchs.--Burn your letter."
Marceau.--"Marceau was clever and good, and of great promise, but he had little experience before he fell."
Moreau.--"No great things."
Augereau.--Ditto.
Junot.--Ditto.
Gouvion St. Cyr.--"A clever and a good officer, but deficient in enterprise and vigor."
Macdonald.--"Too regular, too methodical; an excellent man, but not a great general."
Ney.--"No extent of capacity; but he was unfortunate; he is dead."
Victor.--"An old woman, quite incapable."
Jourdan--"Not capable of leading large armies."
Massena.--"Excellent in great danger; negligent and of no goodness out of danger.
Knew war well."
Marmont.--"Understands the theory of war perfectly.
History will tell what he did with his knowledge." (This was accompanied with a sardonic smile.)
Regnier.--"An excellent officer." (I denied this, and gave
Soult the history of his operations at Sabugal.)
Soult replied that he was considered to be a great officer in
France; but if what I said could not be controverted as to fact, he was not a great officer; his reputation was unmerited.
(The facts were correctly stated, but
Regnier was certainly disaffected to
Napoleon at the time; his unskillful conduct might have been intentional.)
Desaix.--"Clever, indefatigable, always improving his mind, full of information about his profession, a great soldier, a noble character in all points of view; perhaps not amongst the greatest of generals by nature, but likely to become so by study and practice, when he was killed."
Kleber.--"Knew him perfectly; colossal in body, colossal in mind.
He was the god of war;
Mars in human shape.
He knew more than
Hoche, more than Desaix; he was a greater general, but he was idle, indolent, and would not work."
Berthier and
Clarke.--"Old women--
Catins. The Emperor knew them and their talents; they were fit for tools, machines, good for writing down his orders, and making arrangements according to rule; he employed them for nothing else.
Bah! they were very poor.
I could do their work as well or better than they could, but the
Emperor was too wise to employ a man of my character at a desk; he knew I could control and tame wild men, and he employed me to do so."