hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Matching Documents
The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.
Document | Max. Freq | Min. Freq | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
A Dictionary of Greek and Roman biography and mythology (ed. William Smith) | 23 | 23 | Browse | Search |
Plato, Letters | 3 | 3 | Browse | Search |
Strabo, Geography (ed. H.C. Hamilton, Esq., W. Falconer, M.A.) | 2 | 2 | Browse | Search |
Strabo, Geography | 2 | 2 | Browse | Search |
Titus Livius (Livy), Ab Urbe Condita, books 8-10 (ed. Benjamin Oliver Foster, Ph.D.) | 1 | 1 | Browse | Search |
Pliny the Elder, The Natural History (ed. John Bostock, M.D., F.R.S., H.T. Riley, Esq., B.A.) | 1 | 1 | Browse | Search |
Aeschines, Speeches | 1 | 1 | Browse | Search |
Polybius, Histories | 1 | 1 | Browse | Search |
Appian, The Foreign Wars (ed. Horace White) | 1 | 1 | Browse | Search |
M. Tullius Cicero, De Officiis: index (ed. Walter Miller) | 1 | 1 | Browse | Search |
View all matching documents... |
Browsing named entities in A Dictionary of Greek and Roman biography and mythology (ed. William Smith). You can also browse the collection for 360 BC or search for 360 BC in all documents.
Your search returned 23 results in 21 document sections:
Ambustus
7. M. Fabius Amibustus, N. F. M. N., son, as it appears, of No. 4, was consul in B. C. 360, and carried on the war against the Hernici, whom he conquered, and obtained an ovation in consequence. (Liv. 7.11; Fast. Triumph.) He was consul a second time in 356, and carried on the war against the Falisci and Tarquinienses, whom he also conquered.
As he was absent from Rome when the time came for holding the comitia, the senate, which did not like to entrust them to his colleague, who had appointed a plebeian dictator, and still less to the dictator himself, nominated interreges for the purpose.
The object of the patricians was to secure both places in the consulship for their own order again, which was effected by Ambustus, who seems to have returned to Rome meantime.
He was appointed the eleventh interrex, and declared two patricians consuls in violation of the Licinian law. (Liv. 7.17.)
He was consul a third time in 354, when he conquered the Tiburtes and obtained a triumph in
Amyntas
3. Grandson of Amyntas II., was left an infant in nominal possession of the throne of Macedonia, when his father Perdiccas III. fell in battle agains the Illyrians, B. C. 360. (Diod. 16.2.)
He was quietly excluded from the kingly power by his uncle Philip, B. C. 359, who had at first acted merely as regent (Just. 7.5), and who felt himself so safe in his usurpation, that he brought up Amyntas at his court, and gave him one of his daughters in marriage In the first year of the reign of Alexander the Great, B. C. 336, Amyntas was executed for a plot against the king's life. (Thirlw. Gr. Hist. vol. v. pp. 165, 166, 177, vol. vi. p. 99, and the authorities to which he refers ; Just. 12.6, and Freinsheim, ad Curt. 6.9, 17.)
Anaxis
(*)/Anacis), a Boeotian, wrote a history of Greece, which was carried down to B. C. 360, the year before the accession of Philip to the kingdom of Macedonia. (Diod. 15.95
Apollodo'rus
(*)Apollo/dworos).
1. Of ACHARNE in Attica, son of Pasion, the celebrated banker, who died B. C. 370, when his son Apollodorus was twenty-four years of age. (Dem. pro Phorm. p. 951.) His mother, who married Phormion, a freedman of Pasion, after her husband's death, lived ten years longer, and after her death in B. C. 360, Phormion became the guardian of her younger son, Pasicles. Several years later (B. C. 350), Apollodorus brought an action against Phormion, for whom Demosthenes wrote a defence, the oration for Phormion, which is still extant.
In this year, Apollodorus was archon eponymus at Athens. (Diod. 16.46.) When Apollodorus afterwards attacked the witnesses who had supported Phormion, Demosthenes wrote for Apollodorius the two orations still extant kata\ *Stefa/nou. (Aeschin. de Fals. Leg. p. 50; Plut. Dem. 15.) Apollodorus had many and very important law-suits, in most of which Demosthenes wrote the speeches for him (Clinton, Fast. Hell. ii. p. 440, &100.3d. e
A Dictionary of Greek and Roman biography and mythology (ed. William Smith), (search)
Libo, Poete'lius
2. C. Poetelius Libo Visolus, C. F. Q. N., perhaps a grandson of No. 1, was consul B. C. 360, with M. Fabius Ambustus.
He gained a victory over the Gauls and the inhabitants of Tibur, and celebrateda triumph over both nations.
In the Fasti Capitolini the name of Poetelius occurs in the form which is given above. Livy calls him C. Poetelius Balbus, and Diodorus gives the name without any cognomen. (Fasti Capit.; Liv. 7.11; Diod. 16.9.)
A Dictionary of Greek and Roman biography and mythology (ed. William Smith), (search)
Ma'ximus, Fa'bius
1. Q. Fabius Maximus, M. F. N. N., with the agnomen RULLIANUS or RULLUS, was the son of M. Fabius Ambustus, consul B. C. 360. (Liv. 8.33.)
He was curule aedile in B. C. 331, when, through the information of a female slave, he discovered that the mortality prevailing at Rome arose from poison administered by women to their husbands. (Liv. 8.18; V. Max. 2.5.3; Oros. 3.10.) Fabius was master of the equites to L. Papirius Cursor in B. C. 325, whose anger he incurred by giving battle to the Samnites near the Imbrivian or Simbrivian hills during the dictator's absence, and contrary to his orders. Victory availed Fabius nothing in exculpation.
The rods and axes were ready for his execution, and a hasty flight to Rome, where the senate, the people, and his aged father interceded for him with Papirius, barely rescued his life, but could not avert his degradation from office. (Liv. 8.29-35; Dio Cass. Fr. Mai; V. Max. 2.7.8; Frontin. Strat. 4.1.39; Aurel. Vict. Vir. Ill. 31, 3
A Dictionary of Greek and Roman biography and mythology (ed. William Smith), (search)
Neopto'lemus I.
(*Neopto/lemos), king of Epeirus, was son of Alcetas I., and father of Alexander I., and of Olympias, the mother of Alexwander the Great. On the death of Alcetas, Neoptolemus and his brother Arymbas or Arrybas agreed to divide the kingdom, and continued to rule their respective portions without any interruption of the harmony between them, until the death of Neoptolemus, which, according to Droysen, may be placed about B. C. 360. No further incidents of his reign have been transmitted to us. (Paus. 1.11. §§ 1, 3; Just. 7.6.10, 17.3.14; Droysen, Hellenismus, vol. i. p. 250, not.) [E.