hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Brigadier-General Ellison Capers, Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 5, South Carolina (ed. Clement Anselm Evans) 31 9 Browse Search
Robert Underwood Johnson, Clarence Clough Buell, Battles and Leaders of the Civil War. Volume 4. 10 2 Browse Search
The Daily Dispatch: December 7, 1861., [Electronic resource] 6 0 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 31. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 5 1 Browse Search
The Daily Dispatch: June 17, 1862., [Electronic resource] 4 0 Browse Search
Thomas Wentworth Higginson, Massachusetts in the Army and Navy during the war of 1861-1865, vol. 2 4 0 Browse Search
Horace Greeley, The American Conflict: A History of the Great Rebellion in the United States of America, 1860-65: its Causes, Incidents, and Results: Intended to exhibit especially its moral and political phases with the drift and progress of American opinion respecting human slavery from 1776 to the close of the War for the Union. Volume I. 4 0 Browse Search
A Roster of General Officers , Heads of Departments, Senators, Representatives , Military Organizations, &c., &c., in Confederate Service during the War between the States. (ed. Charles C. Jones, Jr. Late Lieut. Colonel of Artillery, C. S. A.) 2 0 Browse Search
Benson J. Lossing, Pictorial Field Book of the Civil War. Volume 1. 2 0 Browse Search
The Daily Dispatch: June 6, 1864., [Electronic resource] 2 0 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: October 18, 1861., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for James Conner or search for James Conner in all documents.

Your search returned 1 result in 1 document section:

The Daily Dispatch: October 18, 1861., [Electronic resource], Another Southerner sent to Fort Lafayette. (search)
unlawful and unjustifiable; moreover, that the law of 1781 contains a request of Congress to the several States that they would pass laws relative to the sequestration of alien rights. He based his objections on ground of technical objection, of the construction of the law and the conformity of the writ of the law, of that to the Constitution and the contradiction of common right. Mr. Attorney Miles replied with a most felicitous allusion to the absence of the District Attorney, Major James Conner. In eloquent terms he alluded to that gentleman, illustrating with Roman virtue the field and forum; he further said that he would pursue the argument on no technical ground. It might have been enough when the learned jurist who first moved this opposition stated that he had nothing to show, to have received this ore tenus as a return; it were possible to show that a demurrer was no remedy whereby to quash a writ, but he met the grounds of constitutional and legal right. Mr. P