Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: August 19, 1861., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for Gregory or search for Gregory in all documents.

Your search returned 3 results in 2 document sections:

The Daily Dispatch: August 19, 1861., [Electronic resource], American Affairs in Europe. (search)
lators and American adventurers. Repudiation in its worst form might ensue, if, after the loan were negotiated, an arrangement between the North and South for an amicable adjustment should be effected The best way to avoid any difficulty in this respect will be to refuse financial assistance either to the Federal authorities or the representatives of the Confederate States. Rifled cannon and a United States loan as contraband of war. In the House of Commons, on the 29th of July, Mr. Gregory asked whether the First Lord of the Treasury had received any information that goods contraband of war, among other things a battery of artillery, had been conveyed from this country to New York, in the steamship Kangaroo, and that a loan for the United States Government had been placed upon the Stock Exchange? If so, was this in accordance with our principles of non-intervention? Lord Palmerston replied that he personally cognizant of the matters to the honorable member referred, b
The Daily Dispatch: August 19, 1861., [Electronic resource], American Affairs in Europe. (search)
nection with our extracts from European journals, we add the following editorial from the New York Herald of the 15th instant: There is a prospect of renewed complications with Great Britain. In the House of Commons, on the 29th of July, Mr. Gregory, who may be considered the agent of the rebels in the British Parliament, asked whether the Government had received any information to the effect that goods contraband of war, including a battery of artillery, had been conveyed from Liverpool arise, they would of course be dealt with by the Government. There would be less doubt of the exact meaning of the words of Lord Palmerston's reply if the goods contraband of war had not been associated with the loan in the question asked by Mr. Gregory. But, not withstanding, it is obvious that he meant as soon as the loan was opened on the London Stock Exchange the Government would interfere to prevent its negotiation, as an infringement of British neutrality. Were it not so, the reply wo