hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Harper's Encyclopedia of United States History (ed. Benson Lossing) 593 9 Browse Search
Horace Greeley, The American Conflict: A History of the Great Rebellion in the United States of America, 1860-65: its Causes, Incidents, and Results: Intended to exhibit especially its moral and political phases with the drift and progress of American opinion respecting human slavery from 1776 to the close of the War for the Union. Volume I. 106 0 Browse Search
Hon. J. L. M. Curry , LL.D., William Robertson Garrett , A. M. , Ph.D., Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 1.1, Legal Justification of the South in secession, The South as a factor in the territorial expansion of the United States (ed. Clement Anselm Evans) 90 4 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 16. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 46 0 Browse Search
Benjamnin F. Butler, Butler's Book: Autobiography and Personal Reminiscences of Major-General Benjamin Butler 35 1 Browse Search
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events: Poetry and Incidents., Volume 2. (ed. Frank Moore) 32 0 Browse Search
C. Edwards Lester, Life and public services of Charles Sumner: Born Jan. 6, 1811. Died March 11, 1874. 32 2 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 25. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 31 1 Browse Search
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events: Poetry and Incidents., Volume 1. (ed. Frank Moore) 29 1 Browse Search
The Daily Dispatch: June 11, 1862., [Electronic resource] 28 0 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in Horace Greeley, The American Conflict: A History of the Great Rebellion in the United States of America, 1860-65: its Causes, Incidents, and Results: Intended to exhibit especially its moral and political phases with the drift and progress of American opinion respecting human slavery from 1776 to the close of the War for the Union. Volume I.. You can also browse the collection for Andrew Jackson or search for Andrew Jackson in all documents.

Your search returned 53 results in 6 document sections:

Each was of Revolutionary Whig antecedents — Jackson, though but thirteen years of age, having beeas regarded by Congress and the country. General Jackson was not merely an extreme Republican of tice-President without serious opposition; General Jackson receiving a plurality of the electoral voublican Presidents, down to and including General Jackson, recognize and affirm the wisdom, benefic on which they had resolved and entered. General Jackson and Mr. Calhoun had become estranged and bundantly established See Parton's Life of Jackson, pp. 455-6. that the original draft was the P17, when one was negotiated on our part by Andrew Jackson and others, again renewing and confirming Puritan aspirants to the Presidency. General Jackson was chosen President in 1828, receiving mve this judgment enforced, but could not. General Jackson was President, and would do nothing of thate of our highest judicial tribunal. President Jackson, in his first Annual Message, already re[22 more...]
y, commending his preference of Mr Adams to Gen. Jackson, but had afterward gone with the current in Virginia for Jackson — basing this preference on his adhesion to the State rights, or Strict Constlic deposits from the United States Bank by Gen. Jackson, and supported Mr. Clay's resolution censurhereafter, the thorough-going supporters of Gen. Jackson, having elected a decided majority to the Less from Tennessee, inclosed in a letter to Gen. Jackson, asking the General's opinion thereon. Thacerity, your friend and obedient servant, Andrew Jackson. Hon. A. V. Brown. This letter was sectly charges that the letter was drawn from Gen. Jackson expressly to be used to defeat Mr. Van Bureg influence adverse to the former, although Gen. Jackson was among his most unflinching supporters tof 1800. The election of Madison in 1812, of Jackson in 1828, and of Harrison in 1840, had probabl of Christian bondage into savage freedom. Gen. Jackson, in 1816, wrote to Gen. Gaines with respect[3 more...]
kept sacred. Not till the spirit of conquest rages, will the people on either side molest or mix with each other. The correspondence between the Secretary of War (Gov. Marcy) and Gen. Taylor, which preceded and inspired this movement, clearly indicates that Mr. Polk and his Cabinet desired Gen. Taylor to debark at, occupy, and hold, the east bank of the Rio Grande, though they shrank from the responsibility of giving an order to that effect, hoping that Gen. Taylor would take a hint, as Gen. Jackson was accustomed to do in his Florida operations, and do what was desired in such manner as would enable the Government to disavow him, and evade the responsibility of his course. Gen. Taylor, however, demanded explicit instructions, and, being thereupon directed to take position so as to be prepared to defend the soil of our new acquisition to the extent that it had been occupied by the people of Texas, he stopped at the Nueces, as aforesaid. Here, though no hostilities were offered or t
ement — representing its purposes as violent, aggressive, and sectional, when they date back to 1784, and trace their paternity to Jefferson, a Southron and a slaveholder — but because this was the first declaration by a Northern statesman of mark that the success of the Republicans would not only incite, but justify, a Southern rebellion. The facts that the National Republicans, in 1828, supported John Q. Adams and Richard Rush — both from Free States--while their antagonists supported Andrew Jackson and John C. Calhoun, both slaveholders, and thus secured nearly every elector from the Slave States, are conveniently ignored by Mr. Fillmore. The Presidential contest of 1856 was ardent and animated up to the October elections wherein the States of Pennsylvania and Indiana were carried by the Democrats, rendering the election of Buchanan and Breckinridge a moral certainty. In despite, however, of that certainty, the Republicans carried New York by a plurality of 80,000, with the six<
ely accorded to any court, died in 1835 at the ripe age of eighty. None of the Judges appointed by any predecessor of Gen. Jackson survived. Of the nine who now composed that august tribunal, eight had been selected from the ranks of the Democratictions than those of eminent legal ability or acquirements. John McLean, of Ohio, was placed on the bench, in 1829, by Gen. Jackson, in order to make room for a Postmaster-General who would remove from office the postmasters who had supported Mr. Adaand appoint Jacksonians to their places; which McLean — having been continued in office by Mr. Adams, though himself for Jackson — could not decently do. Roger B. Taney, of Maryland, was likewise appointed by Jackson in 1836, as a reward for his serJackson in 1836, as a reward for his services in accepting the post of Secretary of the Treasury and removing the Federal deposits from the United States Bank, upon the dismissal of William J. Duane, of Pennsylvania, for refusing to make such removal. Mr. Taney, born in 1777, was an ultr
conducted to its final triumph-principles inculcating sectional hate in place of federal kindness; in direct contravention with the dying injunctions of the Father of his Country, and of the most eminent of his successors in the presidency, General Jackson. He proceeded to blame the Republicans, whose principles and conduct have produced the mischief, for refusing to give the South such guarantees of her rights as are required; adding: What the guarantees should be is in vain for us to I love the men, but I hate treason. What is it, but the nullification of all the rights of the United States, and the execution of the laws! A threat to reject them, in arms! It is nullification by the wholesale I, for one, have venerated Andrew Jackson, and my blood boiled, in old time, when that brave patriot and soldier of Democracy said--The Union--it must and shall be preserved! [Loud applause.] Preserve it! Preserve it! Why should we preserve it, if it would be the thing that these