hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Harper's Encyclopedia of United States History (ed. Benson Lossing) 2,462 0 Browse Search
Knight's Mechanical Encyclopedia (ed. Knight) 692 0 Browse Search
George Bancroft, History of the United States from the Discovery of the American Continent, Vol. 10 516 0 Browse Search
George Bancroft, History of the United States from the Discovery of the American Continent, Vol. 3, 15th edition. 418 0 Browse Search
C. Julius Caesar, Gallic War 358 0 Browse Search
George Bancroft, History of the United States from the Discovery of the American Continent, Vol. 4, 15th edition. 298 0 Browse Search
Hon. J. L. M. Curry , LL.D., William Robertson Garrett , A. M. , Ph.D., Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 1.1, Legal Justification of the South in secession, The South as a factor in the territorial expansion of the United States (ed. Clement Anselm Evans) 230 0 Browse Search
H. Wager Halleck , A. M. , Lieut. of Engineers, U. S. Army ., Elements of Military Art and Science; or, Course of Instruction in Strategy, Fortification, Tactis of Battles &c., Embracing the Duties of Staff, Infantry, Cavalry, Artillery and Engineers. Adapted to the Use of Volunteers and Militia. 190 0 Browse Search
C. Edwards Lester, Life and public services of Charles Sumner: Born Jan. 6, 1811. Died March 11, 1874. 186 0 Browse Search
George Ticknor, Life, letters and journals of George Ticknor (ed. George Hillard) 182 0 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: March 7, 1861., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for France (France) or search for France (France) in all documents.

Your search returned 5 results in 2 document sections:

England and France on the Southern Question. The leading journals of England and France are beginning to indicate unmistakably that their respective countries have not the most remote idea of dispensing with Southern cotton. The London Herald France are beginning to indicate unmistakably that their respective countries have not the most remote idea of dispensing with Southern cotton. The London Herald of the 5th of February, anticipating the official news which we have just received from Washington, says: "The United States so long as they cohered, felt strong enough to stand aloof from the public law of Europe; but the secession movement, b" and as "exhibiting so much rashness and audacity" because it relies upon the abolition feeling of Europe. But imperial France warns her against the delusion, and points to the present attitude of England as "beginning to measure the whole extent o, at least temporarily, her institutions, now attacked with so much vehemence." It is thus very evident that neither France nor England will permit a blockade of the Cotton States, and that it is highly probable they already have an understandin
The Daily Dispatch: March 7, 1861., [Electronic resource], The French Press on the Southern Confederacy. (search)
n tendencies, that her commercial interests depend in a great measure on the prosperity of the South, which Europe has a deep interest in seeing preserve, at least temporarily, her institutions, now attacked with so much vehemence. The question is a plain one; we have previously said that the South, far from being the aggressor, as it seems to be generally supposed, was the victim of Northern pretensions. Those recent words of the Emperor also find an echo in the bottom of our hearts: "France has no desire to meddle in any way where her interests are not at stake; in fine, if she has sympathies for what is great and noble, she does not hesitate to condemn everything that violates justice and the rights of nations." Public opinion will appreciate them on both sides of the Atlantic, and will find for the great interests at stake in the American crisis, a solution which may be satisfactory to all — namely, an amicable separation, without conflict and without war, instead of a secess