hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Sorting
You can sort these results in two ways:
- By entity
- Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
- By position (current method)
- As the entities appear in the document.
You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.
hide
Most Frequent Entities
The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.
Entity | Max. Freq | Min. Freq | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Stonewall Jackson | 345 | 1 | Browse | Search |
Joseph E. Johnston | 292 | 10 | Browse | Search |
John L. Porter | 152 | 4 | Browse | Search |
United States (United States) | 138 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Robert E. Lee | 128 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Robert Edward Lee | 126 | 20 | Browse | Search |
John M. Brooke | 122 | 6 | Browse | Search |
Jefferson Davis | 109 | 1 | Browse | Search |
U. S. Grant | 101 | 1 | Browse | Search |
Sherman | 100 | 4 | Browse | Search |
View all entities in this document... |
Browsing named entities in a specific section of Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 19. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones). Search the whole document.
Found 195 total hits in 42 results.
Winchester, Va. (Virginia, United States) (search for this): chapter 1.10
Mobile Bay (Alabama, United States) (search for this): chapter 1.10
Capture of the C. S. Ram Tennessee in Mobile bay, August, 1864.
[from the Winchester times, November 26, 1890.] by Dr. Daniel B. Conrad, fleet surgeon, C. S. Navy.
Kansas city, Mo., November, 1890.
We had been lying idly in Mobile bay for many months, on board the iron-clad ram Tennessee, whose fighting deck differed materially from that of the Federal monitors.
It resembled the i Pensacola for four months, he explained his whole plan of action to me of that second fight in Mobile bay as follows: I did not expect to do the passing vessels any serious injury; the guns of Fort Mo formed a perfect arch around his chin.
The Confederate torpedoes planted at the entrance to Mobile bay were the first, and were very primitive in their construction—merely a lager beer keg filled w deral fleet without exploding.
During the four months that we were guarding the entrance to Mobile bay we were not by any means safe from the danger of our own contrivances.
One hot July morning w
Fort Warren (Massachusetts, United States) (search for this): chapter 1.10
Milton (Missouri, United States) (search for this): chapter 1.10
Capture of the C. S. Ram Tennessee in Mobile bay, August, 1864.
[from the Winchester times, November 26, 1890.] by Dr. Daniel B. Conrad, fleet surgeon, C. S. Navy.
Kansas city, Mo., November, 1890.
We had been lying idly in Mobile bay for many months, on board the iron-clad ram Tennessee, whose fighting deck differed materially from that of the Federal monitors.
It resembled the inside of the hip-roof of a house, rather than the cheese-box of Ericsson's Monitor. On the 1st of August, 1864, we saw a decided increase in the Federal fleet, which was then listlessly at anchor outside of Fort Morgan, in the Gulf of Mexico, consisting of eight or ten wooden frigates, all stripped to a girt line and clean for action; their topmasts sent down on deck and devoid of everything that seemed like extra rigging.
They appeared like prize fighters ready for the ring.
Then we knew that trouble was ahead, and wondered to ourselves why they did not enter the bay any day. On the 3d of
Chicago (Illinois, United States) (search for this): chapter 1.10
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) (search for this): chapter 1.10
[8 more...]
Gulf of Mexico (search for this): chapter 1.10
Richmond (Virginia, United States) (search for this): chapter 1.10
Fort Morgan (Alabama, United States) (search for this): chapter 1.10
Hartford (Connecticut, United States) (search for this): chapter 1.10