Browsing named entities in Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 29. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones). You can also browse the collection for Richard H. Dana or search for Richard H. Dana in all documents.

Your search returned 8 results in 2 document sections:

Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 29. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), Memoir of Jane Claudia Johnson. (search)
he motion to quash. For the government there appeared the newly appointed District Attorney, S. Ferguson Beach, Richard H. Dana, Jr., of Boston, and H. H. Wells, who had been the military appointee as Governor of Virginia. The Attorney-General, rness and logic. At the close of Mr. Ould's speech, the Chief Justice said that he was not surprised, as intimated by Mr. Dana, at the ground taken by the defendant. The course of the argument, he said, was anticipated, as the point urged was the common principle of constructive repeal. Mr. Beach then opened for the government, and Mr. Wells and Mr. Dana followed on the same side. Mr. O'Conor closed for the defense. On the close of Mr. Wells' speech, the court adjourned until the next day, which was occupied by Mr. Dana and Mr. O'Conor. The arguments are set out very fully and carefully in General Johnson's report of the case, and were each revised by the speaker. The report was not published until eight years after the trial
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 29. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), The trials and trial of Jefferson Davis. (search)
he motion to quash. For the government there appeared the newly appointed District Attorney, S. Ferguson Beach, Richard H. Dana, Jr., of Boston, and H. H. Wells, who had been the military appointee as Governor of Virginia. The Attorney-General, rness and logic. At the close of Mr. Ould's speech, the Chief Justice said that he was not surprised, as intimated by Mr. Dana, at the ground taken by the defendant. The course of the argument, he said, was anticipated, as the point urged was the common principle of constructive repeal. Mr. Beach then opened for the government, and Mr. Wells and Mr. Dana followed on the same side. Mr. O'Conor closed for the defense. On the close of Mr. Wells' speech, the court adjourned until the next day, which was occupied by Mr. Dana and Mr. O'Conor. The arguments are set out very fully and carefully in General Johnson's report of the case, and were each revised by the speaker. The report was not published until eight years after the trial