hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 36 0 Browse Search
William Campbell 16 0 Browse Search
Mason 15 15 Browse Search
Charles Carroll 12 0 Browse Search
Henry Wilson 6 0 Browse Search
Valparaiso (Indiana, United States) 6 0 Browse Search
Poland (Poland) 6 0 Browse Search
New England (United States) 6 0 Browse Search
Messrs Herbert 4 0 Browse Search
Farragut 4 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: April 7, 1863., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 84 total hits in 29 results.

1 2 3
United States (United States) (search for this): article 21
n of Paris, in 1866, and accepted by the Confederate States, at the invitation of the English Governjudicially effected the interests of the Confederate States. Attention is also called in this letteeived from the Secretary of State of the Confederate States, in which instructions is quoted the texubt entertained by the Government of the Confederate States as to the construction placed by the Goapplies to the Government or people of the United States; but says, with reference to his own Goverr Majesty's Government any proposal to the United States to recognizes the Southern Confederacy would irritate the United States, and any proposal to the Confederate States to return to the Union woConfederate States to return to the Union would irrigate the Confederates. The next letter from Mr. Mason is on the subject of gallien, anions which, in his judgment, entitle the Confederate States to be recognized of fight as a separate bility and permanence.--Should the Confederate States of America win that place among nations it mi
North America (search for this): article 21
nfederate Government to prohibit or dis the expert of cotton; on the contrary he state that he is instructed to assure her Majority Government that if Europe is without American cotton, it is because Europe has not thought fit to her ships to America for cotton. The following is the reply to this letter: "Foreign Office, July 10, 1862. "Sir: I am directed by Russell to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 7th last, respecting the blockade of the Southern coast of North America. I am, &c. A. H. Layard" The next letter of the series it one from Mr. Mason, dated July 17th, on the subject of intervention. In this note he calls Earl Russell's attention to his own and Lord Palmerston's reply to inquiries made in each House of Parliament as to the intention of her Majesty's Government to tender offices of mediation to the contending powers in America, that the Government declined such mediation at present, on the ground that in the inflamed and irritat
Havana (Illinois, United States) (search for this): article 21
the 30th of March, publish a correspondence between Mr. Meson; the Confederate Minister at the Court of London, and Karl Russell, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the English Government. The first of the series of letters embraced in this correspondence is deed April 1st, 1862, and is from Mr. Mason to Nari Russell, whose attention is called to a list of vessels, taken from official sources, which had run the blockade of different Confederate ports, and with their cargoes entered the ports of Havana and Matanzarin Cuba, during the months of January and February of that year. To this letter Earl Russell replies, under date of the 14th, simply presenting his compliments to Mr. Mason, and acknowledging the reception of his letter of the 1st. Under date of the 7th of July, Mr. Mason addressed another letter to Earl Russell, on the subject of the blockade, in which he called the attention of that official to what would seem to be an addition engrafted by the British Government on t
Galveston (Texas, United States) (search for this): article 21
Goody and destructive contest may not be distant." The next letter of importance in this correspondence is one from Mr. Mason to Earl Russell, dated February 16th, 1863, with reference to the raising of the blockade by the naval actions at Galveston and Charleston. To this the Foreign Secretary replies: "Foreign Office, Feb, 19, 1863. "Sir. --With reference to my letter of the 16th instant acknowledging the receipt of your letter of that day, calling attention to the accounts which had reached this country, tending to show that the blockade of the ports of Galveston and Charleston had been put an end to by the action of the Confederate naval forces, I have the honor now to state to you that the information which her Majesty's Government have derived from your letter, and from the public journals on this subject, is not sufficiently accurate to admit of their forming an opinion, and they will accordingly, by the first opportunity, instruct Lord Lyons to report ful
Nari Russell (search for this): article 21
on; the Confederate Minister at the Court of London, and Karl Russell, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the English Government. The first of the series of letters embraced in this correspondence is deed April 1st, 1862, and is from Mr. Mason to Nari Russell, whose attention is called to a list of vessels, taken from official sources, which had run the blockade of different Confederate ports, and with their cargoes entered the ports of Havana and Matanzarin Cuba, during the months of January and F Government that if Europe is without American cotton, it is because Europe has not thought fit to her ships to America for cotton. The following is the reply to this letter: "Foreign Office, July 10, 1862. "Sir: I am directed by Russell to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 7th last, respecting the blockade of the Southern coast of North America. I am, &c. A. H. Layard" The next letter of the series it one from Mr. Mason, dated July 17th, on the subject
Bari Russell (search for this): article 21
ce among the independent nations of the earth. He concludes by requesting an interview with Earl Russell, as he desires to submit some views connected with the subject of the letter, which he thinks may be better imparted in a to this latter Bari Russell replies: Foreign Office, July 31, 1862. "Lord Russell presents his compliments to Mr. Mason. He begs to assure Mr. Mason that it is from no want of respect to him that Lord Russell has delayed sending an answer to his letter of e honor now to state to you that the information which her Majesty's Government have derived from your letter, and from the public journals on this subject, is not sufficiently accurate to admit of their forming an opinion, and they will accordingly, by the first opportunity, instruct Lord Lyons to report fully on the matter. "When his Lordship's report has been received and considered I shall have the honor of making a further communication to you on the subject. "I am, @c., Russell"
Meson (search for this): article 21
Correspondence between Mr. Mason and Earl Russell. The New York papers, of the 30th of March, publish a correspondence between Mr. Meson; the Confederate Minister at the Court of London, and Karl Russell, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the English Government. The first of the series of letters embraced in this correspondence is deed April 1st, 1862, and is from Mr. Mason to Nari Russell, whose attention is called to a list of vessels, taken from official sources, which had run the blockade of different Confederate ports, and with their cargoes entered the ports of Havana and Matanzarin Cuba, during the months of January and February of that year. To this letter Earl Russell replies, under date of the 14th, simply presenting his compliments to Mr. Mason, and acknowledging the reception of his letter of the 1st. Under date of the 7th of July, Mr. Mason addressed another letter to Earl Russell, on the subject of the blockade, in which he called the attention of that offi
Harl Russell (search for this): article 21
far as it applies to the Government or people of the United States; but says, with reference to his own Government and people, that "although they do not in any term invite such interposition, yet they can see nothing in their position which could make either offensive or irritating a tender of such offices on the part of her Majesty's Government, as might lead termination of the war — a war hopelessly carried on against them, and which is attended by a want on waste of human life." Harl Russell replied that the meaning of his declarations was, that in the opinion of her Majesty's Government any proposal to the United States to recognizes the Southern Confederacy would irritate the United States, and any proposal to the Confederate States to return to the Union would irrigate the Confederates. The next letter from Mr. Mason is on the subject of gallien, and is dated July 14 1861. In this letter our minister sets forth that the new Confederacy has evinced both the capac
A. H. Layard (search for this): article 21
ibit or dis the expert of cotton; on the contrary he state that he is instructed to assure her Majority Government that if Europe is without American cotton, it is because Europe has not thought fit to her ships to America for cotton. The following is the reply to this letter: "Foreign Office, July 10, 1862. "Sir: I am directed by Russell to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 7th last, respecting the blockade of the Southern coast of North America. I am, &c. A. H. Layard" The next letter of the series it one from Mr. Mason, dated July 17th, on the subject of intervention. In this note he calls Earl Russell's attention to his own and Lord Palmerston's reply to inquiries made in each House of Parliament as to the intention of her Majesty's Government to tender offices of mediation to the contending powers in America, that the Government declined such mediation at present, on the ground that in the inflamed and irritated temper of the belligerent
Matanzarin Cuba (search for this): article 21
h, publish a correspondence between Mr. Meson; the Confederate Minister at the Court of London, and Karl Russell, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the English Government. The first of the series of letters embraced in this correspondence is deed April 1st, 1862, and is from Mr. Mason to Nari Russell, whose attention is called to a list of vessels, taken from official sources, which had run the blockade of different Confederate ports, and with their cargoes entered the ports of Havana and Matanzarin Cuba, during the months of January and February of that year. To this letter Earl Russell replies, under date of the 14th, simply presenting his compliments to Mr. Mason, and acknowledging the reception of his letter of the 1st. Under date of the 7th of July, Mr. Mason addressed another letter to Earl Russell, on the subject of the blockade, in which he called the attention of that official to what would seem to be an addition engrafted by the British Government on the principle of
1 2 3