hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 74 0 Browse Search
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) 34 0 Browse Search
Abraham Lincoln 32 0 Browse Search
Missouri (Missouri, United States) 28 0 Browse Search
Fremont 15 1 Browse Search
B. Magoffin 15 1 Browse Search
Siegel 14 0 Browse Search
Jefferson Davis 13 1 Browse Search
Georgia (Georgia, United States) 12 0 Browse Search
Beauregard 11 5 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: September 12, 1861., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 34 total hits in 7 results.

Missouri (Missouri, United States) (search for this): article 26
ent of the Confederate States of America neither intends nor desires to disturb the neutrality of Kentucky. The assemblage of troops in Tennessee, to which you refer, had no other object than to repel the lawless invasion of that state by the forces of the United States, should their Government attempt to approach it through Kentucky without respect for its position of neutrality. That such apprehensions were not groundless, has been proved by the course of that Government in Maryland and Missouri, and more recently in Kentucky itself, in which, as you inform me, "a military force has been enlisted and quartered by the United States authorities. " The Government of the Confederate States has not only respected most scrupulously the neutrality of Kentucky, but has continued to maintain the friendly relations of trade and intercourse which it has suspended with the people of the United States generally. In view of the history of the past, it can scarcely be necessary to assur
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) (search for this): article 26
intain a position of strict neutrality between the belligerent parties. " In the same communication you express your desire to elicit "an authoritative assurance that the Government of the Confederate States will continue to respect and observe the neutral position of Kentucky." In reply to this request, I lose no time in assuring you that the Government of the Confederate States of America neither intends nor desires to disturb the neutrality of Kentucky. The assemblage of troops in Tennessee, to which you refer, had no other object than to repel the lawless invasion of that state by the forces of the United States, should their Government attempt to approach it through Kentucky without respect for its position of neutrality. That such apprehensions were not groundless, has been proved by the course of that Government in Maryland and Missouri, and more recently in Kentucky itself, in which, as you inform me, "a military force has been enlisted and quartered by the United State
Maryland (Maryland, United States) (search for this): article 26
t the Government of the Confederate States of America neither intends nor desires to disturb the neutrality of Kentucky. The assemblage of troops in Tennessee, to which you refer, had no other object than to repel the lawless invasion of that state by the forces of the United States, should their Government attempt to approach it through Kentucky without respect for its position of neutrality. That such apprehensions were not groundless, has been proved by the course of that Government in Maryland and Missouri, and more recently in Kentucky itself, in which, as you inform me, "a military force has been enlisted and quartered by the United States authorities. " The Government of the Confederate States has not only respected most scrupulously the neutrality of Kentucky, but has continued to maintain the friendly relations of trade and intercourse which it has suspended with the people of the United States generally. In view of the history of the past, it can scarcely be neces
United States (United States) (search for this): article 26
elicit "an authoritative assurance that the Government of the Confederate States will continue to respect and observe the neutral position of lose no time in assuring you that the Government of the Confederate States of America neither intends nor desires to disturb the neutrality oo repel the lawless invasion of that state by the forces of the United States, should their Government attempt to approach it through Kentuckrm me, "a military force has been enlisted and quartered by the United States authorities. " The Government of the Confederate States haConfederate States has not only respected most scrupulously the neutrality of Kentucky, but has continued to maintain the friendly relations of trade and intercourse which it has suspended with the people of the United States generally. In view of the history of the past, it can scarcely be necessary to assure your Excellency that the Government of the Confederate States will continue to respect the neutrality of Kentucky so long as her
Jefferson Davis (search for this): article 26
President Davis to Gov. Magoffin. Richmond, Aug. 28, 1861. To the Hon.B.Magoffin, Gov. of Kentucky, &c. Sir: I have received your letter informing me that "since the commencement of the unhappy difficulties yet pending in the country, the people of Kentucky have indicated a steadfast desire and purpose to maintain a position of strict neutrality between the belligerent parties. " In the same communication you express your desire to elicit "an authoritative assurance that the Govet ought not to be shut to the assailed when they seek to enter it for the purposes of self-defence. I do not, however, for a moment believe that your gallant State will suffer its soil to be used for the purpose of giving an advantage to those who violate its neutrality and disregard its rights over those who respect them both. In conclusion, I tender to your Excellency the assurance of my high consideration and regard. And am, sir, very respectfully, yours, &c., Jefferson Davis.
B. Magoffin (search for this): article 26
President Davis to Gov. Magoffin. Richmond, Aug. 28, 1861. To the Hon.B.Magoffin, Gov. of Kentucky, &c. Sir: I have received your letter informing me that "since the commencement of the unhappy difficulties yet pending in the country, the people of Kentucky have indicated a steadfast desire and purpose to maintain a position of strict neutrality between the belligerent parties. " In the same communication you express your desire to elicit "an authoritative assurance that the Government of the Confederate States will continue to respect and observe the neutral position of Kentucky." In reply to this request, I lose no time in assuring you that the Government of the Confederate States of America neither intends nor desires to disturb the neutrality of Kentucky. The assemblage of troops in Tennessee, to which you refer, had no other object than to repel the lawless invasion of that state by the forces of the United States, should their Government attempt to approach
August 28th, 1861 AD (search for this): article 26
President Davis to Gov. Magoffin. Richmond, Aug. 28, 1861. To the Hon.B.Magoffin, Gov. of Kentucky, &c. Sir: I have received your letter informing me that "since the commencement of the unhappy difficulties yet pending in the country, the people of Kentucky have indicated a steadfast desire and purpose to maintain a position of strict neutrality between the belligerent parties. " In the same communication you express your desire to elicit "an authoritative assurance that the Government of the Confederate States will continue to respect and observe the neutral position of Kentucky." In reply to this request, I lose no time in assuring you that the Government of the Confederate States of America neither intends nor desires to disturb the neutrality of Kentucky. The assemblage of troops in Tennessee, to which you refer, had no other object than to repel the lawless invasion of that state by the forces of the United States, should their Government attempt to approach i