Who proposes to cheat the people by letting them speak their own untrammelled views in the choice of their ablest and best men, to determine upon all these matters, involving their peace.
I think the proposition of my honorable friend had a considerable smack of unfairness, not to say cheat.
He wished to have no convention, but for the Legislature to submit their vote to the people — submission to abolition rule or resistance?
Now, who in Georgia
would vote “submission to abolition rule” ? (Laughter.)
Is putting such a question to the people to vote on, a fair way of getting an expression of the popular will on all these questions?
I think not. Now, who in Georgia
is going to submit to abolition rule?
--The convention will.
--No, my friend, Georgia
will never do it. The convention will never secede from the Georgia Platform
Under that there can be no abolition rule in the General Government
I am not afraid to trust the people in convention upon this and all questions.
Besides, the Legislature were not elected for such a purpose.
They came here to do their duty as legislators.
They have sworn to support the Constitution of the United States
They did not come here to disrupt this Government.
I am therefore for submitting all these questions to a convention of the people.
Submit the question to the people, whether they would submit to abolition rule or resist, and then let the Legislature act upon that vote?
Such a course would be an insult to the people.
They would have to eat their platform, ignore their past history, blot out their records, and take steps backwards, if they should do this.
I have never eaten my record or words, and never will.
But how will it be under this arrangement if they should vote to resist, and the Legislature should reassemble with this vote as their instruction?
Can any man tell what sort of resistance will be meant?
One man would say secede; another pass retaliatory, measures; these are measures of resistance against wrong — legitimate and right — and there would be as many different ideas as there are members on this floor.
Resistance don't mean secession — that in no proper sense of the term is resistance.
Believing that the times require action, I am for presenting the question fairly to the people, for calling together an untrammelled convention, and presenting all the questions to them whether they will go out of the Union
, or what course of resistance in the Union
they may think best, and then let the Legislature act, when the people in their majesty are heard, and I tell you now, whatever that convention does, I hope and trust our people will abide by. I advise the calling of a convention with the earnest desire to preserve the peace and harmony of the State
I should dislike above all things to see violent measures adopted, or a disposition to take the sword in hand, by individuals, without the authority of law.
My honorable friend said last night, “I ask you to give me the sword, for if you do not give it to me, as God lives, I will take it myself.”
(Applause on the other side.)
--I have no doubt that my honorable friend feels as he says.
It is only his excessive ardor that makes him use such an expression; but this will pass off with the excitement of the hour.
When the people in their majesty shall speak, I have no doubt that he will bow to their will, whatever it may be, upon the “sober second thought.”
determine to go out of the Union
, I speak for one, though my views might not agree with them, whatever the result may be, I shall bow to the will of her people.
Their cause is my cause, and their destiny is my destiny; and I trust this will be the ultimate course of all. The greatest curse that can befall a free people is civil war.
But, as I said, let us call a convention of the people; let all these matters be submitted to it, and when the will of a majority of the people has thus been expressed, the whole State will present one unanimous voice in favor of whatever may be demanded; for I believe in the power of the people to govern themselves when wisdom prevails and passion is silent.
Look at what has already been done by them for their advancement in all that ennobles man. There is nothing like it in the history of the world.
Look abroad from one extent of the country to the other, contemplate our greatness.
We are now among the first nations of the earth.
Shall it be said, then, that our institutions, founded upon principles of self-government, are a failure?
Thus far it is a noble example, worthy of imitation.
The gentleman, Mr. Cobb
, the other night said it had proven a failure.
A failure in what?
Look at our expanse in national power.
Look at our population and increase in all that makes a people great.
Why we are the admiration of the civilized world, and present the brightest hopes of mankind.
Some of our public men have failed in their aspirations; that is true, and from that comes a great part of our troubles.
No, there is no failure of this Government yet. We have made great advancement under the Constitution
, and I cannot but hope that we shall advance higher still.
Let us be true to our cause.
Now, when this convention assembles, if it shall be called, as I hope it may, I would say in my judgment, without dictation, for I am conferring with you freely and frankly, and it is thus that I give my views, I should take into consideration all those questions which distract the public mind; should view all the grounds of secession so far as the election of Mr. Lincoln
is concerned, and I have no doubt they