hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Lucius R. Paige, History of Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1630-1877, with a genealogical register 70 70 Browse Search
Harper's Encyclopedia of United States History (ed. Benson Lossing) 25 25 Browse Search
Knight's Mechanical Encyclopedia (ed. Knight) 23 23 Browse Search
HISTORY OF THE TOWN OF MEDFORD, Middlesex County, Massachusetts, FROM ITS FIRST SETTLEMENT, IN 1630, TO THE PRESENT TIME, 1855. (ed. Charles Brooks) 15 15 Browse Search
George Bancroft, History of the Colonization of the United States, Vol. 1, 17th edition. 14 14 Browse Search
The Cambridge of eighteen hundred and ninety-six: a picture of the city and its industries fifty years after its incorporation (ed. Arthur Gilman) 7 7 Browse Search
Thomas Wentworth Higginson, Henry Walcott Boynton, Reader's History of American Literature 3 3 Browse Search
George Bancroft, History of the United States from the Discovery of the American Continent, Vol. 2, 17th edition. 3 3 Browse Search
Charles A. Nelson , A. M., Waltham, past, present and its industries, with an historical sketch of Watertown from its settlement in 1630 to the incorporation of Waltham, January 15, 1739. 3 3 Browse Search
Cambridge History of American Literature: volume 1, Colonial and Revolutionary Literature: Early National Literature: Part I (ed. Trent, William Peterfield, 1862-1939., Erskine, John, 1879-1951., Sherman, Stuart Pratt, 1881-1926., Van Doren, Carl, 1885-1950.) 2 2 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in George Bancroft, History of the Colonization of the United States, Vol. 1, 17th edition.. You can also browse the collection for 1650 AD or search for 1650 AD in all documents.

Your search returned 14 results in 3 document sections:

George Bancroft, History of the Colonization of the United States, Vol. 1, 17th edition., Chapter VI (search)
chill, VI. 160—186. Hammond's Leah and Rachel, 16. The faithfulness of the Virginians Chap VI.} 1650 June. did not escape the attention of the royal exile; from his retreat in Breda he transmitted tures in America were at liberty to reject. Hazard, i. 634, 635. The memorable ordinance of 1650 was a war meas- 1650. ure, and extended only to the colonies which had adhered to the Stuarts. 1650. ure, and extended only to the colonies which had adhered to the Stuarts. All intercourse with them was forbidden, except to those who had a license from parliament or the council of state. Foreigners were rigorously excluded; Ibid. 636—638. and this prohibition was desttained unlimited liberty of commerce, which she regulated by independent laws. The ordinance of 1650 was rendered void by the act of capitulation; the navigation act of Cromwell was not designed for infinite wealth were indulged; E. Williams, Virginia, and Virginia's Discovery of Silk-worms, 1650. while the population of Virginia, at the epoch of the restoration, may have been about thirty th
George Bancroft, History of the Colonization of the United States, Vol. 1, 17th edition., Chapter VII (search)
he rebellion were concealed by a general amnesty; Bacon, 1650, c. XXIV. and the province was rescued, though not without , 20. An equal union prevailed between all branches of 1650 April the government in explaining and confirming the civilas confirmed by a statute. Bacon, 1649, c. XII, and note 1650, c. i. The dangerous prerogative of declaring martial law wed to the precincts of the camp and the garrison; Bacon, 1650, c. XXVI. and a perpetual act declared, that no tax should the province, except by the vote of their dep- Chap. VII.} 1650. uties in a general assembly. The strength of the proprietafidently reposed in the affections of his people. Bacon, 1650, c. XXV Well might the freemen of Maryland place upon theirn advancing the peace and happiness of the colony. Ibid. 1650, c. XXIII. But the revolutions in England could not but excited attention by his persevering opposition; Bacon, 1650, c. XVII. Charles II., incensed against Lord Baltimore for
George Bancroft, History of the Colonization of the United States, Vol. 1, 17th edition., Chapter 10: (search)
e synod met by adjournment, it was by the common consent of all the Puritan colonies, that a system of church government was established for the congregations. Result of a Synod, &c. See also Winthrop and Hubbard. Cotton Mather is diffuse on the subject The platform retained authority for more than, Chap. X.} a century, and has not yet lost its influence. It effectually excluded the Presbyterian modes of discipline from New England. The jealousy of independence was preserved in its 1650 to 1655. wakefulness. The Long Parliament asserted its power over the royalist colonies in general terms, which seemed alike to threaten the plantations of the north; and now that royalty was abolished, it invited Massachusetts to receive a new patent, and to hold courts and issue warrants in its name. But the colonial commonwealth was too wary to hazard its rights by merging them in the acts of a government of which the decline seemed approaching. It has been usual to say, that the people